English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

By my definition of spirituality, believing in self, believing in the power of mother nature, believing in natural selection as a process, believing in the magical interconnectedness of life from lightning strike to amino acid to protein to organelle to single-celled organism to full life form, these are all forms of being spirtual.

What say you all? Can you accept that just like one singular person doesn't subscribe to every scientific theory all at once so too can can it be acceptable that many world-views can co-exist without belittling one over another?

2007-12-03 08:56:27 · 24 answers · asked by CodemanCmC 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

EDIT: My sincere apologies to you all, because I'm new to this portion of Answers, I realize I did not give you all credit enough to be able to distinguish between the technical definition of "atheism" and the larger definition of it as a part of society's vernacular.

Of course I pose the question to those who do not perscribe to any external religious movement, whether it is nonthesistic or not.

2007-12-03 09:06:21 · update #1

24 answers

I don't believe in the god of the Bible but I can't speak for anyone else. I have experienced things that science has not explained or even acknowledged and I cannot deny what I don't know. I suppose that makes me agnostic if I accept there might be forms of spirituality. I dunno! Who does?

2007-12-03 09:06:18 · answer #1 · answered by checkmate 6 · 0 0

That is more of a pantheist approach than an atheistic one.

I do like some religions' ideals though. Especially the one that teaches that honesty, self-reliance, and being a generous host are very important. I've always thought such was important and until recently had no clue that any religion taught that.

So I follow their code, but am not a believer in the theistic aspect.

2007-12-03 09:04:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Believe in Environmentalism. Protection of Planet. There is room for Greed if not imposed on others. More Religious than spiritual but I think Greed could be placed in a place of worshipp. I think people can believe in it without harm to others.There should be room to examine it as a belief though. If it can be accepted not all people believe in Greed but still can within reason I do not see whynot. You know of means to protect all beliefs The Separation thing and Religious Freedoms one from The U.S.A.

2007-12-03 09:15:50 · answer #3 · answered by darren m 7 · 0 0

My definition of spirituality is about a philosophy that values life and experience. In that secular sense, I am very spiritual. I'm not a nihilist, though I think any meaning we create will be temporary.

Life is interconnected, and even if it feels magical, it is due to scientific processes (and I don't consider that to be demeaning or a bad thing). I love life. It's a miracle beyond reasoning, and I don't even believe in supernatural.

2007-12-03 09:02:10 · answer #4 · answered by Dalarus 7 · 2 0

I'm a Taoist. Plenty of us are, in fact.

Atheists, for the most part, simply don't believe in things that have been proven false, such as the majority of deity-based religions in the world.

Atheists are some of the most open-minded people in the world. But because we reject certain cults, the cult-members take offense and say that our minds are closed. It's really a sad state of affairs.

I often feel like an adult talking to kindergarteners when I discuss religion with the people whose minds are trapped by it.

2007-12-03 09:00:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

there is no such ingredient like an atheist of Agnostic variety.What could it positioned across if we call a pregnant woman a 'Double 0.5 Pregnant'?All Agnostic are in fact fence sitters and human beings such as you,properly could properly be termed as 'double fence sitters',what ever it ought to recommend.extra over,what you call as your very own spirituality isn't something better than a kit deal of uncertainties and confusion.that's extra useful to be with out it than carry the millstone of such uncertainties tied to a minimum of one's neck with the aid of out the existence.study after study have been performed to benefit,confirm and come out with the info of hundreds of the pronounced situations of rebirth or reincarnation.even with the indisputable fact that many situations have been unusual yet there became into no longer something to envision that those have been situations of rebirth or reincarnation.permit's go a step added and assume that reincarnation happens,how does it exchange the perspective of atheists?Even reincarnation continues to be in fact a organic and organic technique and something as a count of recycling.observe:- Sorry for being curt and exhibit regret if it offends you in any way.

2016-10-10 04:16:34 · answer #6 · answered by currier 4 · 0 0

If you qualify natural selection as spiritual, you are redefining the word spiritual, since it refers to the supernatural. It is an observed and characterized NATURAL phenomenon.

You are confusing spirituality with ignorance -- the "I don't know all the details, so it must be miraculous" mentality. The "God of the gaps" is about as weak as things come spiritually.

2007-12-03 09:06:49 · answer #7 · answered by novangelis 7 · 1 0

You're making a shrine to causality by calling it spirituality...

Do you also feel spiritual about what does NOT happen, like a three-stranded DNA molecule or non-carbon based lifeforms?

How spiritual do you feel towards the asteroid belt or the Oort cloud?

2007-12-03 09:03:15 · answer #8 · answered by Lex Fok B.M.F. 3 · 0 0

I am an atheist and I am a very un-spiritual person, but I think that everyone is entitled to his own way of thinking and feeling. Spirituality is something personal, and as long as someone does not try to declare his own feelings as absolute truths for everyone to subscribe to, he or she is free to pursue his own ways.

2007-12-03 09:10:34 · answer #9 · answered by NaturalBornKieler 7 · 1 0

An atheist is some one who doesn't believe in gods. Nothing more.

I assume that some atheists believe in the form of spirituality that you describe, I personally don't.

2007-12-03 09:04:09 · answer #10 · answered by battleship potemkin AM 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers