She's a disaster waiting to happen. She already ran the country for 8 years and it was miserable.
2007-12-03 08:48:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Is there already a universal health care program in existence which makes Hillary's proposal irrelevant ? If yes, You may make a point which shows the inadequacy of Hillary proposal. If no, you will be betraying the interests of the unfortunate Americans who are not able to afford the cost of a proper insurance cover for their families. Probably you are fan of some inadequate man in whose favor you want to shoot down a healthy proposal and there by its proponent.
2007-12-03 17:25:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The premise of this question is simply ridiculous.
If you're referring to the health care plan that Bill and Hillary proposed back in 1993, it got shot down by a combination of heavy lobbying by the health insurance groups and scare tactics. So she had no effect on the current health system, which, when compared with the effectiveness and cost of health care in other industrialized nations, is rather poor for what we're paying for.
Heck, I think anything would be an improvement over what we have now.
Look, if you want to be critical of Hillary and her policies, fine, but argue it from a logical standpoint rather than nonsense.
2007-12-03 11:14:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Silverkris 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
@Zinger! good wing ethical hypocrite? You, in actuality stand in a morally indefensible place. maybe you may desire to evaluate giving your guy or woman money to those human beings in desire, fairly than making use of government coercion to do it. mutually as that is laudable to attain into your guy or woman pocket to grant to those in desire, that is unquestionably despicable to attain into somebody else's pocket to do an identical. performed by potential of government that is named 'earnings redistribution', yet while performed privately that is named robbery. you may do properly to appreciate that there is not any authority for this interior the shape, yet Congress does it at the back of our backs anyhow, wisely assuming that the sheeple are too dumb to renowned what Congress can and can't do. So, even with your blended-up ethical self-righteous time table, what you're featuring is only unconstitutional. That replaced right into slightly long, yet i'm offended approximately your lack of know-how.
2016-12-17 06:02:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Why trust a lawyer to fix health care. Frivolous lawsuits are the major cause for the high cost of health insurance.
2007-12-03 09:21:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by wichitaor1 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Do you have any better proposals to rationalize the health care system? I agree--I don't think you've even read it. AND, it's not carved in stone--everyone who's already vested would have a shot at it, as always.
2007-12-03 08:54:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anna P 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Dennis Kucinich is the only candidate who has a health care plan that will actually benefit people
2007-12-03 08:55:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well she is a lawyer.
The old joke... How can you tell when a lawyer is lying? Her lips are moving.
2007-12-03 15:13:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by witz1960 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
You do know that her health care plan was not implemented in the 1990s, right?
2007-12-03 10:01:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Hubris252 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
I would bet money you've never even read the proposal.
2007-12-03 08:49:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋