is to eat out all the uranium on earth (that I think will happen in the coming 85 years) and destroying all the hydrogen and nuclear bombs the world has now. Is that funny or rude?
2007-12-03 05:45:58 · 9 answers · asked by JOEG 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
No way to do that except by removing knowledge and not allowing any research into anything to do with nuclear power after that. Unfortunately there is no way to remove knowledge. The amount of raw unranium is really not known-we know how much is available now with current technology but oil was supposed to be in extremely short supply and the world reserves used up back in the 1970's which hasn't happend yet and the world population could not exceed I am thinking it was 3 billion because the food supplies could never be explanded or be efficient enough to support the so all but that number would starve. Maybe a good dream but just a dream.
2007-12-03 06:01:53 · answer #1 · answered by GunnyC 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It'll never happen... Go ahead get rid of the Nuclear objects. There will be another one right out on the Market short after. C'mon, no one just has Nukes. It's Defense on top of Defense on top of Defense, etc... It's a constant effect. You'll never be able to diminish any type of 'Overkill' weapon as I call it.
2007-12-03 13:49:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its neither funny nor rude
2007-12-03 13:50:14 · answer #3 · answered by oTTo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Build tons of our own...blow enemies out of the water.
2007-12-03 13:48:35 · answer #4 · answered by BennyBones 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Silly - at least to a nerd like me.
2007-12-03 13:49:17 · answer #5 · answered by hfrankmann 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kinda childish, I'd say.
2007-12-03 13:48:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Childish "question"
they will only find another substance to use!!
2007-12-03 14:28:33 · answer #7 · answered by conranger1 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither...impossible, that's what it is. Have a star for trying!:)
2007-12-03 13:49:09 · answer #8 · answered by Bree 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rude? What a dumb option...
2007-12-03 13:50:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋