English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Personally, I never gave a crap about Gillian Gibbons. She made her bed, let her lie in it. She knew she was going to a country full of people who are so ashamed of their crappy dysfunctional culture that anything -- ANYTHING -- will drive them into a homicidal rage. And if she didn't know that, she was in a grotesque state of denial.

The lesson is that we need to cut off immigration from muslim countries. We don't need them exporting their poisonous religion here.

90% of the world's immigrants are muslims. They don't want to live in a muslim country, so why should I?

2007-12-03 01:48:07 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

To justin_l: unfortunately, when muslims come to the west, they expect us to bend over backwards and forwards and sideways to accomodate their sensibilities.

They want a piece of the propserity their own culture cannot create, but they don't realize that our standard of living here in the west didn't just happen. It is a direct result of the tradtion of free thought and inquiry their own culture has rejected.

2007-12-03 01:58:55 · update #1

6 answers

They should be apologizing to her,not the other way around. I do agree with one part though,she asked for it and so I don't really feel too sorry for her. If you hang out with savages,you should expect to be treated savagely,DUH!!


YTP

2007-12-03 03:00:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

It seems that the Muslims have the greatest problem integrating with other cultures. In the UK they have set up an informal Shariah court. Eventually people are going to lose patience with them and there will be a widespread back-lash.
Unfortunately I think the government has little idea just how people feel about them and they believe they can legislate to make people accept their behaviour.

2007-12-03 02:08:42 · answer #2 · answered by cheir 7 · 4 0

i think of this unfavourable lady replaced into very naive whilst going to this united states of america, it would have been prudent to have checked to work out what behaviour replaced into probable to reason offence. I do experience that possibly the Muslim leaders there could be a sprint greater understanding in realising that she meant no offence, it replaced into purely a unfavourable determination. all the reaction from those Muslim adult men in Sudan merely looks a sprint over the right i assumed their faith replaced into in step with non violent understanding, this looks to have been misplaced over the previous couple of years by using an albeit few, even regardless of the undeniable fact that that's them who get the exposure no longer the incredibly peace loving ones.

2016-10-18 23:37:16 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I have to agree in part. When one moves to a host country, one is subject to the laws of that country. With the world in the state it is today--it is difficult to believe anyone would move to the Sudan and not be very very very careful not to do anything outside of religious law. While it is entertaining media--the Sudan high court was reasonable--slap on the wrist and deport the woman before her own stupidity killed her.

2007-12-03 01:54:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Maybe people leaving Muslim countries is a sign that the Muslim people are becoming more progressive and wish to join the rest of the world in the 21st century, even if thier governments do not.

Maybe accepting Muslim immigrants would be a better solution to the problem of radical Islam than simply banning them.

2007-12-03 01:52:41 · answer #5 · answered by justin_I 4 · 2 2

great points xylocopa1961 - you wrote down your comments as if you were reading them off my mind!

2007-12-03 03:27:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers