No. I'm cajun. I'd love him over rice and gravy.
2007-12-03 01:15:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Acorn 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
The Kingists started it. The Duckingists just wanted to get out of the way. The Coduckingists tried to come to the Duckingists' defense. And the Crocks are just laughing themselves silly about the whole thing.
That's why.
2007-12-03 01:30:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
it particularly is achieveable. I see 2 diverse tactics interior the Bible, and that they are style of contradictory, yet no longer unavoidably. One, you notice the apocalyptic thought - that God finally controls each and every thing. this form of negates loose will. 2, you notice the prophetic thought - that God can provide us a call, and it particularly is as much as us to endure the implications of our selections. in case you purchase the apocalyptic line, which has a tendency to crop up every time a team of persons are horribly oppressed and without desire, then sure it negates Pharaoh's loose will, notwithstanding it affirms the desire for the Israelites that God is finally on top of issues. in case you bypass with the prophetic concepts-set, the way i've got heard one rabbi clarify that's: Pharaoh had to endure the implications for his selections. and at last his selections subsidized him right into a nook the place he particularly did no longer have a call anymore. The place of work of the pharaoh, the burden of accountability, particularly improve right into a tension that he ought to no longer counter notwithstanding if he had wished to. you will see this even today in people who're in positions of potential - they oftentimes experience as though they have no determination. that's the way I also have a tendency to study it, even understanding that the persons who wrote it have been in all probability extra of the apocalyptic concepts-set. Peace to you.
2016-12-17 05:35:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
to qualify as a crocoduckist you have to forget about science.
2007-12-03 01:16:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!
2007-12-03 01:16:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋