English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-12-02 16:30:48 · 21 answers · asked by king Arthur of USA (Returns) 3 in Politics & Government Immigration

i am talking about illegal immigrants!

2007-12-02 16:31:38 · update #1

What about the cost?

2007-12-02 16:33:56 · update #2

How long will it take?

2007-12-02 16:35:33 · update #3

21 answers

Of course they could! I say put them on a NON STOP train in box cars and send them back accross the border. It would certianly be much better accomodations then what they came over in.

If our governemnt would just spend the time and money on getting rid of these ILLEGAL INVADERS that they do on supporting them it wouldn't cost much at all.

2007-12-03 04:25:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Actually it's more like 40-60 million. We issue up to 9 million visas a year and a third or over 3 million hide out in the country after the visa has expired. So figure Clinton and Bush it could be at 3 million and then the 3 million for 2005 and you have 33 million from around the world. Then on the southern borden they say 300,000 a month come in. In 2005 they caught over 800,000 and state that for every one person they catch five get by.

Then of that number, now listen, one in seven was from a terro sponsoring nation. Doesn't mean the whold group are terroist, but form the countries on the State Deptments list.

Add to all this that Pres. Clinton increase legal immigration to 2.5 million a year, so during his time there were over 20 million new Americans and then Bush cut it in half to 1.25 million and last week to 1 million a year and you have 1/10th of the population is new. or 30 million or more.

So you got the new folks, plus the folks coming from all over and south america and then the folks flying in on the visas and the government says it's 12-15 million a FLUFFY number.

Remember when the 1986 amnesty came it ended up being 3 times as many as they said. Also studies estimate 38 million. So the 40-60- million number is real..

Now we have had a relationship with our sister country Mexico for centuries, but all the others is nuts. I thought aabout the diseases that are coming back that we had stopped and cannot think they would be coming from Mexico or South America due t the monroe Doctrine, so I figure its from over seas, but aCLU would not let you check them anyway if legal, but something to think about.
Yes you do have the crime, but I can assure you there are folks here that been illegal for 20 years and have not committed a crime.

To deport these folks will be a nightmare. You also have to understand that the employers and government are big time to blame. But we must protect the country and i am upset that Mexico with strict immigration would bring millions to our border. So go figure. Hope these number help. Gov search will show them. I got out of a book. Take care. To be honest I thought you were talking about liberals at first, I thought finally a voice of reason..

2007-12-02 18:48:09 · answer #2 · answered by R J 7 · 1 0

Yes twelve million illegal aliens can be deported very easily along with immigration dept raids at workplaces known to hire illegal aliens such as food precessing plants etc etc.

We can instantly detain an illegal alien and hand them over to the immigration dept for immediate deportation when an illegal is arrested for drunk driving, commiting a murder, driving under the influence, driving without a license, showing up at a hospital trying to obtain welfare benefits etc etc.

A "legal permanent resident" is supposed to carry a green card around and if an immigrant cannot produce this card when asked to show it then they can be detained and then deported.

Emplyers who hire illegal aliens can be snactioned and fined for knowingly hiring illegals.

As for the people who say that the prices would go up because then the jobs would have to pay more that is not true. It would mean that the corporation would pay less to the chief CEO.
For example Delta Airlines hires ticket agents at the airport and the people who process the boarding passes and get the flight loaded and ready for take off only get paid $9.00 per hour to start and maybe they will get up to $13.00 per hour if they do an excellent job. There is no guaranteed pay raise. Years ago when there was lesss immigration those jpobs paid mmore money and had better benefits. No it is only a part time job of 30 hours a week.

Well Delta would have to pay its workers more if illegals left the country and there was more of a demand for workers and they would pay nthe CEO less money. Delta's CEo got $47 million dollars this year in salary but lowered all it employees salaries.

Well this would happen with every big business in America the CEO would get less money and the workers could get more money and the price would not go up for the service.

Right now on average CEO get between 400 to 500 times the yearly salary of a worker in a company.

This is how we can deport all the illegals and create better paying jobs of the same ones that the illegals used to do.

I just used Delta Airlines as an example of what is going on in America but this is happening with every business and company in America the salries are lowered because the immigratrion rate is to high here and there is a surplus of labor. Each company pays less to its workers and the top ceos get millions each year which could have gone to pay workers a better salary.

If these things are followed then we can deport 12 million illegals and build a wall to prevent others from comming in.

2007-12-02 17:55:01 · answer #3 · answered by eimittaa 5 · 1 1

No, way! there is no way you can deport millions of illegal immigrants.... unless you use the nazi, gestapo tactics that some people here want to use. Cram them in train cars like they did to Jews during WWI. But IT AIN'T HAPPENING! Stop dreaming....no one not Democrats, not even Republicans once the election is over is going to talk about illegal immigration anymore!

And to Biwigirl20 above take you hood off, your klan is calling you.

2007-12-03 06:57:35 · answer #4 · answered by J. 2 · 1 0

Yes, they can. It would costs far less to deport them than to pay hundreds of billions of dollars a year in handouts.

But the actual number of illegals is much higher than 12 million, it is more like 38 million. They will self deport if they can't find work, can't get handouts, free health care, welfare or food stamps etc., The Federal government doesn't seem to be stepping up to the plate as much or as fast as we would like, so each state should pass a law similar to Oklahoma's House Bill 1804. Twelve states are currently looking at passing similar legislation.

2007-12-02 17:28:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Yes I am sure there are more than that number. But first we need to git rid of this anchor baby legislation then we need to adopt.
Eisenhower's Immigration policy
Cut and paste this site and go to number seven and see what you think. I would look forward to a comment.
Thanks Bill
Edit
It would cost us less to deport than support. I am talking about tax money that all Americans are paying. Must of which the don't realize.
Who cares how long it takes many would leave if we adopted the Eisenhower plan.

2007-12-02 19:06:11 · answer #6 · answered by getrdone 5 · 1 1

Yes, President Eisenhower deported 1.5 million illegal alien border criminals without the modern day technology that America, the greatest country on earth, has now. Things like computers and jet aircraft and modern communications. It would be easy and fun.

2007-12-02 18:19:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

It probably could happen, but it would take years. You would have to do it in small groups. But maybe it would scare some of the illegals into going home instead of being forced out.

2007-12-05 10:07:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Why no longer? Realistically, if our rules have been enforced and the deportations began, i've got self assurance there may well be a great exodus of illegals leaving the rustic of their very very own volition. the reason they are staying today's via fact they suspect that the U.S. government will returned provide them amnesty and that the government won't enforce the guidelines. notwithstanding, as quickly as there are 10 raids each and every week on unlawful immigrants and companies that hire, harbor and help them and as quickly as landlords are punished for renting to unlawful immigrants, the exodus will start up. i'm under no circumstances in contact approximately how we seem to the worldwide community today via fact our image is fairly undesirable applicable now. we've a popularity for no longer implementing our rules, for a rustic of corruption and for invading soverign countries and conflict mongering. So, why no longer capitalize on that undesirable popularity and start to "clean abode" punishing all lawbreakers, yet rather getting the unlawful immigrants in a foreign country. that's a nationwide risk-free practices difficulty and that's a ethical and ethical difficulty. it sounds as though our u . s . is extra involved in spying on regulation abiding voters, passing rules on the subject of exhibiting undies and bra straps, permitting id theft and our privateness to be no longer in basic terms violated yet outsourced to different countries, and on and on. So, why shouldn't we come back to being a rustic of rules? Why might we enable an AG whose dad and mom are "migrant workers" translated unlawful immigrants to hold the optimal place of work interior the land. there is plenty incorrect right here and we ought to get it applicable. there is not any time like the present. would not it trouble all of us else that we glance to care extra approximately notwithstanding if Michael Vick performs soccer and notwithstanding if animals are slaughtered via canine scuffling with than we do approximately notwithstanding if our u . s . is invaded via unlawful immigrants, or that our Congress and our President has a 70% + disapproval score and that they are not being punished or having their salaries taken away and their contracts being rehashed? Why could Michael Vick get carry of a harsher penalty than a Congress and a President who sell unlawful immigration, who fails to sell the enforcement of rules, who refuse to do their jobs and who proceed to gets a commission regardless of their inept strikes and their unamerican strikes?

2016-12-17 05:22:34 · answer #9 · answered by carra 4 · 0 0

We do not need to deport a single person.

They will leave on their own and at their own expense.

We simply take away all the rewards and incentives for them to come here and break the law.

No more welfare.
No more anchor babies.
No more $10,000+ a year educations for their kids.
No more free medical.
No more jobs.
No more anything.

No more illegals. Its fair, fast, efficient and simple.

2007-12-02 16:35:05 · answer #10 · answered by youarewrongbobisright 5 · 10 0

fedest.com, questions and answers