Deists is the umbrella term used to describe their religions, but at least some, Benjamin Franklin being one, were more discontent with the religions of the time, rather than being total deists who believed that God was only a "watchmaker."
Here is a link to some quote by Benjamin Franklin on religion. I'll try to find some by other Founding Fathers:
http://bvml.org/GCIAH/franklin.html
2007-12-02 14:11:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by moonman 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Whether Founding Fathers or pilgrims, they all came over to America to get out from under the religious oppression and taxation.
What difference does it make now? Our political leaders, today, do not have the same beliefs as those that created the "constitution" and the "bill of rights".
Ours is not a government "Of the people", "By the people" and "For the people" anymore!
2007-12-02 14:08:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Elory 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The phrase "Founding Fathers" is a proper noun. It refers to a very specific group of people, the 55 delegates to the Constitutional Convention. Yes, there were other important players, like Jefferson, whose thinking deeply influenced the shape of our nation and who were not in attendance, but the 55 Fathers make up the core.
The denominational affiliation of these men is a matter of public record. Among the delegates were 28 Episcopalians, 8 Presbyterians, 7 Congregationalists, 2 Lutherans, 2 Dutch Reformed, 2 Methodists, 2 Roman Catholics, 1 unknown and only 3 deists--Williamson, Wilson and Franklin, this at a time when church membership entailed a sworn public confession of biblical faith.(John Eidsmoe, Christianity and the Constitution, (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1987), p. 43.)
This is a very revealing tally. It means that the members of the Constitutional Convention, the most influential group of men shaping the political foundations of our nation, were almost all Christians, 51 of 55--a full 93%. Indeed, most were Calvinists (the Presbyterians and the Dutch Reformed), considered by some to be the most extreme and dogmatic form of Christianity.
2007-12-02 13:48:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
faith is the politics of a perception. It has not something to do with the perception in a author as maximum folk do, even people who hate faith. all and sundry has an analogous gates to their spirituality, desires and visions (Numbers 12:6). not all and sundry makes use of them. What you're liking is probably her integrity (self-honesty) and her capacity to make certain for the period of the lies and critiques that infect society and (with any luck) faith. If we could like a non violent international we could desire to consistently anticipate that many human beings's perspectives we are able to trust different than people who positioned on critiques (based on 0.5 truths and lies) like a badge or safeguard. all and sundry desires, and that enter many circumstances in keeping with sleep is the customary source of our fact, achievement, creativity, well being and good relationships, and well timed information on many matters besides as cautions and warnings of issues volatile or endangering to us. Does that help open your recommendations to the international and different astounding human beings in it?
2016-10-10 02:57:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Most were Deist. There were a few Christians as well, but not the majority, contrary to what most people believe. Washington, the father of our country, considered himself a Deist.
2007-12-02 13:48:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by JavaGirl ~AM~ 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
Different sources interpret the primary historical evidence differently.
Many of them were deists, however, many also maintained the trappings of Christianity. As such, without direct, declarative statements from any of them, any guess is at best just that -- a guess.
2007-12-02 13:50:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
I believe most were Deists.
2007-12-02 13:47:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by punch 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Most were Christians who held the Bible to be God's Word. Thats why so many of our laws and so much of our constitution is based upon Biblical principles. We where once a strong Christian nation but that light is fading... :-(
2007-12-02 13:52:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Blessed 5
·
2⤊
5⤋
endurokart
Beat me too it and blew you arguement out of the water that they wer not Christians..
Sorry
2007-12-02 13:56:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Freemason's
2007-12-02 13:47:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by NERO 6
·
0⤊
3⤋