2007-12-01 18:08:03 · 10 answers · asked by rockclimbingfool2002 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music ➔ Singing
Both had their very own unique qualities. While I may even enjoy listening to john better at times, Paul definitely had a stronger voice.
2007-12-02 01:22:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
i don't get it the two. Lennon's voice is proper for his style. If a guitar could desire to sing vocals, it would sound like John Lennon. Paul MacCartney, on the different hand, is neither here nor there, and this replaced right into a sturdy element while he replaced into with the Beatles. John had a various tone. Paul might or a minimum of attempt to undertake a tone that proper the music. After leaving the Beatles he appeared to objective for a signature sound. yet what a valid!!! Why will not be able to the guy only get on suitable of a be conscious and sustain the darn element?!! Irritates the heck out of me along with his crooning. Posters i've got study someplace else say "pipes of piss." i does not bypass that far. yet his voice is slightly skinny and because his Beatles days he's mismanaged it. i might say he desires a vocal coach. yet once you're Paul MacCartney, i assume you sing as you like. yet regrettably, Sir Paul has constantly had somewhat questionable style.
2016-12-10 09:45:10 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its too subjective to make a call on this. Their producer George Martin said John's voice had more character but Paul's was sweeter, and that was the main reason Martin presented them as a group of 4 rather than
2007-12-02 08:08:21 · answer #3 · answered by Bill S 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Paul, definitely. Lennons voice may have had more character but Paul's was better musically.
2007-12-02 21:41:57 · answer #4 · answered by A and S 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
John is a WAY better musician, but Paul is a better singer sad to say. He has a bigger range. But John has a very unique voice. They are both amazingly talented.
2014-06-12 08:37:09 · answer #5 · answered by Rebecca 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Paul McCartney had the better singing voice but I really didn't like it when he started screaming in his songs.
2007-12-01 20:27:05 · answer #6 · answered by RoVale 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I think paul had a better voice a wider range then lennon but lennon could hold his own, tuff quesstion but that my oppion.
2007-12-02 09:19:17 · answer #7 · answered by Albert C 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Singing - Paul
Songwriting - John
2007-12-01 18:16:20 · answer #8 · answered by i_8_the_canary 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
paul mccartney!obviously
2007-12-01 20:19:10 · answer #9 · answered by dry humour 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
john lennon better musician.
2007-12-02 05:47:22 · answer #10 · answered by juan_tamad 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋