I don't know much about each democrat's specific platform... but what has she done specifically or what does she specifically stand for that makes so many liberals dislike her?
2007-12-01 15:33:37 · 26 answers · asked by fa®m 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
both men and women have said they hate her and would "move to another country" if she is elected
2007-12-01 15:45:23 · update #1
Because she voted for war! See who didn't!
http://undertheradarmedia.blogspot.com/2007/11/whats-behind-media.html
http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e361/TroutMaskReplica/paulownsmccain.gif
2007-12-01 21:03:56 · answer #1 · answered by Soul Man 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I am a liberal, and I support Obama. I don't "hate" Hillary, but I absolutely don't want to see her as President. I truly believe that at this point in our country we need a President that will not divide the country. We need somebody that will appeal to both Republicans and Democrats. As I've helped with the Obama campaign, I have come across many, many Republicans that are now switching their party just to be able to caucus for Obama. That's HUGE!
Also, we've already had 12 years of the Bush family...I don't want another 4-8 years of Clinton. And I voted for Bill Clinton,, but we need a change.
Hillary is a stronge, definitely capable women, however she is not what our country needs today.
2007-12-02 06:53:09 · answer #2 · answered by Tamala G 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Many people feel that she is too shrill and too inflexible in her stands to be an effective president. Also, many feel that she is just another Bill clone.
There is also a movement afoot that we want someone else than aBush or a clinton. If you think about it, a Bush or a clinton has been in office for 20 years and many do not want that to go to 24 years (or even 28)
2007-12-01 15:42:08 · answer #3 · answered by Experto Credo 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Rivals of Hillary Clinton are all out against her in their party and it is the reason why there is perception that many Democrats are anti-Hillary.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know if Hillary will likely win.
2007-12-02 16:07:49 · answer #4 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
She is the focal point of hatred for both radical and moderate Republicans. Many moderate democrats are afraid that her nomination would lead to a backlash of hatred and drive away many of the socially conservative voters that have turned to the Democratic party in recent elections.
She may be nominated but more than likely she will not win the presidency.
2007-12-01 15:37:36 · answer #5 · answered by Shadow Knight 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
I don't like certain things about her.. Changing positions on Iraq, she couldn't get healthcare passed when Slick Willie was pres and had a dem controlled congress so why should I think she'll do it this time? Also, Rupert Murdoch hosted one of her fundraisers.. Not likin that one bit.. I'd rather see Obama or Biden got the nod, but if she does.. I'll still support her.. And I wouldn't call myself anti-Hillary.. I'm just not a full fledged supporter as of now..
2007-12-01 15:41:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Maybe if the country were different if Greed were removed they would feel differently. Separation between Greed and State as well as religion. Apply law once religion Greed cannot be made use of as reason for war. Naive maybe but possibility. Perhaps less about Hillary Clinton than this possibility. There are no candidates with this one so why hate any. Elections are like religion advertising each being sold an image. The People could try theirs for a change.
2007-12-01 19:55:53 · answer #7 · answered by darren m 7 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Long time Democrat here, there is not enough space here to type why Iam anti-Hillary Clinton, in fact I don't approve of any of the candidates.
2007-12-02 04:14:05 · answer #8 · answered by Star doodle 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
i don't experience she'll be too historic, although i think she might ultimate serve for one term if she ran and replaced into elected in 2016. She'll be sixty 9, not 70, so serving from sixty 9-seventy 3 in case you have not had any life-threatening ailments like cancer is first-value.
2016-12-10 09:38:43 · answer #9 · answered by carmean 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not a fan because I feel that she is really contentious. She doesn't seem to want to work with Republicans or be moderate in any way. Also, she has had a lot of controversy while she was the first lady both of Arkansas and of the US and she seems a little shady.
2007-12-01 15:38:01 · answer #10 · answered by SHSHSH 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Actually, I was for her until she started talking about giving $5,000 to each newborn. Also, I would rather the health care system be investigated as to why it is so expensive rather than have the government insure everyone. I think we need somebody with a more common sense approach who will consider our current financial status realistically.
2007-12-01 15:59:27 · answer #11 · answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋