Since there is NO evidence that a God exists, and literally mountains of evidense for evolutiona to be named a natural law, is it only to avoid getting the natives up in arms that science keeps calling evolution "Theory" only?
2007-12-01 14:23:01 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Well since a theory and a law are functionally different in science my vote is no. But I do think that we should have a consensus to change the wording so that it isn't confusing to non-scientists. Theories should be called something that points out that they are tested and generally accepted.
2007-12-01 14:30:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
evolution doesnt disprove God
and if you think that there is "NO evidence that a God exists" you have obviously not searched for other views. You probably saw a show on Discovery Channel talking about evolution and commited your life to that belief.
so try to be a little more open minded
2007-12-01 14:29:27 · answer #2 · answered by IAmClifford 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It is probably true that it is still only called theory because of the controversy it causes with creationists. Evolution is fact.
2007-12-01 14:28:27 · answer #3 · answered by Vacant 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No lol because there are huge gaps and unexplained questions so t will always remain a theory.
2007-12-01 14:30:35 · answer #4 · answered by Topaz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Science is based on observation. Thus far, we've only observed intra-species or micro-evolution. We do have evidence that suggests inter-species or macro-evolution, but we've not observed this. So, evolution (on the broad, macro-scale anyway) remains a theory.
2007-12-01 14:27:51 · answer #5 · answered by Brian Tubbs 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Wow and atheists complain about the ability of Christians to spell.
2007-12-01 14:31:19 · answer #6 · answered by Bible warrior 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
We have Jesus to support our claim in creationism yet no missing link to support your claim. I think theory is still the accurate word.
If you wanted to ask this just to piss people off, than I am truly sad for you.
2007-12-01 14:28:51 · answer #7 · answered by Cindy H 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
They would still deny the evidence.
2007-12-01 15:44:42 · answer #8 · answered by Dalarus 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
LOL. Go ahead. You naming it a law does not make it a law.
2007-12-01 14:26:30 · answer #9 · answered by Nina, BaC 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Silly boy, There is no proof of evolution
2007-12-01 14:27:18 · answer #10 · answered by ....... 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋