If one has to sell one's body or indulge in stealing to live how do religions look at it?

Question

Please see the issue in this context. Starvation can kill. Life is sacred and the BELIEF is that MORALLY you cannot exercise your option to end your life as it is only God's prerogative. In such a situation what is wrong with if a person resorts to ways to glorify the will of God? Life bestowed on birth is not our choice but how to live or end our life is our choice. Do you disagree?

Answer 1

god never burdens a soul more then it can bear.

Answer 2

I disagree with you contention. Of course birth was not or is not one's own choice, it is only the fulfillments of natures one of the activity. And the birth and life will definitely end with death, that is the next further activity of nature and there are no choices left to us in this compulsion.

Now the choice for living whether to sell one's body or to indulge in stealing are not only the ways available to choose to live in this world. But there are countless number of ways that given by the nature to everyone in this world, but you are only the person to exercise the option for a living may be based on your liking/compulsions etc.

Every religion as I understood have it's own set principles or can be called "code of conduct" and the person born in any of the religion without any acceptance/will will be subject to the conditions set by the particular religion. But it is for you to decide the acceptance of such conditions when you reach to the stage of making self decision. You took birth as a free man and the man made religion should look to your decision with passion and the only concern should be his good living. It may be understood, the birth when happened then death is a hidden fact. The life will also co-exist and you need not resort to any choices to end your life. The nature's authority is absolute in this regard and you get prepared to follow the time factor. Best wishes.

Answer 3

It happens when parents and preachers fail to raise a child in giving proper value sytem to the child. Or in case of an orphan without both parents or one parent only who has burden of working to feed the child couldn't give best care because society didn't care to help the single parent. Again when society doesn't take care of such children, they grow up in streets, do not get education nor the dood value systesm.

In all cases it is always the failure of society that forces
young but poor persons to rent their bodies or steal to survive. Religious people has to blame themselves for improper care and in result bad personalities develop in growing up young people in society.

Answer 4

Religions might purchse them for thier own benefit ! If one does not have theright to tend his life as it belongs to ?god , why shoud any one take responsibilty to save that body on which he has no right .? Is it not the duty of the God tosave it from hell.?why shoud man bother about the irresponsibility of God who can not protect what vbelongs to HIM?
If life bestowed on birth is not our choice why should it be in our choice to maintain it and save it from hell.It is god's body . HIS property. If HE is himself irresponsible to take care of it let it go to hell .why shoud enyone bother about it ?
Religions have built- in contradictions based on the level of intelligence / ignorance of the persons who made them.