Should all countries offer voluntary euthanasia to HIV positive people to stop new infections?

Question

What are people's reservations if any?

Glee what makes you think i'm not infected? I could be a positive person seeking euthanasia. Get off your high horse and discuss the issue at hand! I'm merely bringing up a point for discussion! I'm not asking for people to be exterminated!

Answer 1

As long as it was their own personal choice... then yes. I believe euthanasia should be allowed.

Answer 2

I think euthanasia should be an option for anyone suffering from a terminal illness. However, There have been major accomplishments in the HIV field, and it is not really a death sentence anymore. Many live long fulfilling lives.

Stopping the spread of the infection has to be up to the people who have it and the people who have sex. (notice I didn't say people who have sex with them... because everyone who has sex should be responsible) Euthanasia should not be used to stop the spread of a disease, it should be used as an alternative death choice for those who will suffer a horrible death if not given that option.

Answer 3

You're advocating murdering people when the only way that they can infect someone is through blood or sexual fluids? What about hepatitis? Or CMV? Or Malaria? Or Polio? Or TB? The last three are either airborne or use insects as vectors.

You are basically telling people that they are worthless and infectious simply because they carry a virus. This idea itself could be viral, and yet I don't advocate at all anyone euthanising you.

The only time when euthanasia should be allowed is in the terminal stages of an illness (within a matter of a couple of months), at the request of the patient (not the suggestion of anyone in authority), when a series of doctors agree on the terminal prognosis, and if at all possible carried out by the patient's own actions.

^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^

Answer 4

I would be more agreeable to people afflicted with HIV to be offered free voluntary clinic trials for medical research that to give up on a treatment or cure to help them. I however cannot understand or comprehend their pain and I am neutral on the doctor assisted suicide subject. Education prevents the spread of infection, people redefining how they respect and protect the health of themselves and others stops new infections, people do not need to die to accomplish this.

Answer 5

<> only because of the fact some thing it legal does not propose it incredibly is ideal. <> there's a reason you will not be able to spell 'assume' without '***'. people who assume too a lot finally end up making asses of themselves. <> would not make experience, does it - and yet, there you're advocating human beings purely assume the government is optimal! <> incorrect! <> advert hominem assaults injury your credibility. in line with possibility Marc, like me, would not see too a lot interior the way of credibility while analyzing your question. <> The term "fetus" actually ability "the extra youthful interior the womb". The fetus IS a residing individual. existence starts at concept, not delivery nor some arbitrary evaluate between. consequently, each and every abortion constitutes the homicide of an unborn individual. <> however the fetus IS human. consequently, abortion IS homicide. <> what's so slender minded approximately acknowledging the unborn for the residing human beings they are? considering which you at the instant can not try this, does not that propose your suggestions is in certainty extra slender than mine? <> That only is going to coach how schizophrenic human establishments could nicely be - and you want to assume such an company (the government) is optimal.

Answer 6

Why in the world would that be necessary? HIV is spread through sexual intercourse or via blood. It's not like the flu for goodness sake. It can be prevented by obstaining from sex and using safety precautions with open wounds.

Answer 7

If they are in chronic pain & would like to die, then yes.
I think it should be offered to cancer patients & other terminal ill ppl who live in agony as well.

New infections are caused by sharing body fluids.
Letting ppl die in peace has nothing to do with it.

Answer 8

Kudos to warrior! I would not like to see a state directed program. It ought to be permitted and be clearly a personal choice, for only that individual knows what they're thinking and feeling

Answer 9

I think anyone suffering the final, grueling stages of any terminal illness should have the right to die before they have to suffer any longer.

Answer 10

I don't know, maybe the fact that an HIV vaccine is nearly ready for clinical trials??