how can you judge a whole religion on a few extremist muslims.. i think its about time we see people or who they really are not regarding race, colour, religion, clothes, background..... be more open minded.... can i have some people agreeing with me please??
2007-12-01 08:35:14 · 26 answers · asked by freefaller 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I wouldn't go so far as to call it terrorism, but I agree. I wonder how many people doing all the bashing around here have ever tried to get to know a Muslim or educated themselves about Islam, I have the feeling most are saying these things based off of nothing more than bigoted stereotypes and hearsay.
2007-12-01 08:41:05 · answer #1 · answered by Salvador 7 · 3⤊ 5⤋
No! How dare you use the word terrorism to describe freedom of speech. You are trying to divert attention from the fact that many Muslims are violent and terrorists. Tell me what a "few" means to you. In the USA, 15% of Muslim men said they support terrorist tactics. In France, the number went to 1 in 3, 33%. In Pakistan, it was over 60%. Ok, let's pretend it's only 10% of Muslims worldwide...that's over 150 MILLION. That's not a few and that number might be conservative!
If Muslims do not like the attitude people have towards islam, place the blame where it belongs...on Muslims. Islam as a whole has a problem, a huge problem, and Muslims simply refuse to admit that.
I saw a Muslim answer that says he demands respect for his belief. Well, I demand to say whatever I want because I have that freedom. Being PC should be against the law.
God Bless.
2007-12-01 08:55:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
there are over a million.6 billion Muslims in the international and that selection will upward push to 2.2 billion by 2030. And there are what, some hundred, some thousand Muslim terrorists in the international? in case you comprise the Taliban than that's 36,000 human beings, yet even it rather is a tiny share of all Muslims (0.00000225 to be good) . So confident, the final public of terrorists are Muslim, however the final public of Muslims are actually not terrorists. and thanks to this they may well be shocked which you think of any Muslim guy or woman on the line is a terrorist.
2016-10-10 00:38:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well i agree with you although I'm a christian. in my opinion people should not judge a whole religion as bad because of bad doing of few of it's follower. but yes this is what people's nature are. because of one person's bad doing all of the community get involved. i always wonder what is in the mind of this few extremist Muslims? how can they have the heart to bomb, hitting a building with a plane etc. where hundreds or thousands of people of many races and religion/belief live. are they thinking that any Muslims that died involved accidentally during their operation as "Jihad"?? if that is what they are thinking then i bet the dead Muslims people surely want be resurrected to kill them just like what they did to them. isn't it much appropriate to just go to the one who hurting them instead of involving public to their so called "Jihad".
2007-12-01 08:54:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Looked like more then a "few" at those riots in Sudan.l Every time there is a Muslim hate rally there are thousands. I think most Muslims living in America are probably peaceful, but the extremists in Islam as a whole are far more then a few.
2007-12-01 08:43:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 2⤋
One must indeed judge a people according to what they overall do, and i have met some very gracious Muslims,, as well as those who wanted to take off my head (in the USA).
But when accurately defining a religion, one must go by the authority behind the name. Thus Christianity is not defined by Rome and her atrocities, but by the Bible, where they are first named (Acts 11:26), and which peaceful and holy people stand in sharp contrast to the atheists (for example) caricature of them.
As for Islam, it does indeed mandate violence multiple times, with insufficient context in Muhammad's monologue to disallow Osama Bin Laden types, and at worst it fosters them. You could not claim a Biblical basis for wordlwide physical Jihad even if you were Jewish. And nothing of the sort for Biblical Christians: http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/JESUS.Vs.Muhammad.html,
And as the Quran and Hadith truly do support religious violence for defense as well as retaliation and subjugation "till all the religion be of Allah," then the fundamental Muslim has the doctrinal upper hand.
Muhammad was not sent by the living and true God of the Bible, but constantly contradicted it, and also presented "another" Jesus, other than the Biblical one that came approx. 600 years before him, in fulfillment of the Hebrew Scriptures, the veracity of which is testified to by thousands of manuscripts, including those who preceded Muhammad by hundreds of years. And absolutely NONE of which agree with Islam's invented version of Bible history and doctrines.
Those are the facts, and thus Muhammad ended up having to rely on the sword, as they do when their indoctrination is able to be challenged. http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/JES...
And what i just wrote warrants me the death penalty in many Islamic counties. So be it.
Choose Jesus and so choose truth and real life!
2007-12-01 08:48:24 · answer #6 · answered by www.peacebyjesus 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Atheists do it with Christians quite easily....and we are all guilty of crimes done by Roman Catholic church hundreds of years ago!
But Muslim discrimination is not "verbel" terrorism....because verbel is not a word.
Aside from that, there are about 100,000,000 Muslims that are "extreme" and ready to die TODAY to kill Jews, Christians and any other non-Muslim.
So is it verbal terrorism? Or common sense and personal safety?
2007-12-01 08:46:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Until the "Teddy Mohammed" business, I might have agreed with you. Now I'm a lot less likely to view Muslims as anything except potential terrorists. Between that incident and the cartoon furor a little while back, I'm really wondering if the so-called 'few' extremists are really that far and few between.
I know that's not the answer you wanted to hear, but there are a lot of us who are now rethinking our earlier liberal view of the Muslim religion and those who practice it.
2007-12-01 08:42:31 · answer #8 · answered by Wolfeblayde 7 · 7⤊ 4⤋
i so agree
however it is a known fact
that most muslims hate jews
if they can hate jews
then why do jews get arrested for hateing muslims
i have musllim freinds who are VERY nice
but i have to admite
if one person in a race does something extreem then that is how the rest is known
and it is ver unfair
but i am totally against terrosrist bobings and suisdal bombing dont you agree ?
2007-12-01 08:40:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Muslims are racism of British woman. It's not America doing the discriminating.
2007-12-01 08:47:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋