Yes, but it is meager.
The Bible does mention Jesus, so that is evidence that there might have been a real "Jesus" that it was at least loosely based on. There's also a few rather sketchy mentions of Jesus in other works, but much of that has been refuted and not considered reliable (except by the zealots who wish it to be true).
Even if there was a real person that the New Testament was based on, though, there is overwhelming evidence that the Jesus character in the Bible has little to nothing to do with the real person. For example, the earliest writings about Jesus were by Paul, who mentioned none of his early life and very little of his teachings. All the detail was added as time when on. Even in the Gospels, Mark, who was the earliest of the Gospel writers wrote a lot less than was elaborated on by the later writers. This is a common symptom of a myth or urban legend, especially when you take into account the fact that many people of that time attributed similar feats to other so-called "holy" people. Prophets were a dime a dozen.
2007-12-01 07:36:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by nondescript 7
·
8⤊
4⤋
There is more written proof for the birth,ministry, death and Resurrection of Jesus Christ than for any other person in ancient history. there is over 24,000 manuscripts dating back to the first and second centuries of the New Testament. These are corroborated by other secular historians like Josephus , Tacitus, Thallus quoted by Julius Africanus, and Pliny the Younger about the fact of Jesus' life. I mean to question that Jesus Christ ever existed is pretty outlandish . After all id he did not exist how do you explain Billions of Christians around the world?
2007-12-01 07:54:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
A lot of your answerers already give a lot of good sources to support their views. I hope you get the idea that even though historians may not all believe in the Biblical accounts of Jesus, very few respectable historians reject the existence of Jesus. More importantly, I don't think you can prove history that is 2000 years old! Historians can't even agree on recent events, such as the assasination of President Kennedy, the Watergate scandal, etc.
Nevertheless, I do wish that you will continue to investigate and will find Jesus Christ as your Lord and Saviour!
2007-12-01 09:14:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
that's all merely faith based. there is not any surely data that Jesus ever existed. there have been no present day writers who reported him. you will locate Christians attempting to apply... Cornelius Tacitus; A.D. 55 to A.D. one hundred twenty Josephus; 37 or 38 advert and died a while after one hundred advert he's as close as we get and his writing is suspect. scholars have self assurance that the assertions concerning Jesus have been inserted into his works as some later date. the controversy rages on. The Bible itself: enormous subject right here because of the fact the bible became created to assert the life of God and Jesus. One would ask, "whilst the bible professes such to be actual, why does it not supply verifiable data to its claims?" extremely we've a e book, referring basically to the recent testomony (The Christian Bible) that's replete with contradiction, delusion, and historic inaccuracy. it can not be depended on as a respected historic source. that's the mythology of the Christian faith and has little or not something in any respect to do with the surely data. There are gnostic books that declare Jesus thought the God of the previous testomony became the evil writer of this international and that to be a Christian became to disclaim him and his rules. There are gnostic books that have Jesus escaping the Crucifixion and going into Egypt. There are books that deny the divinity of Jesus, the virgin start, and the reality that he's God appear in human style on the earth. (This doctrine became relatively debated in 325 CE on the Council of Nicea and then usual as reality.) 3 hundred years after the loss of life of Jesus. in short. there is not any stable data for the life of Jesus. All we even have are blind assertions. greater is even person-friendly abut Apelonious, a as much as date of Jesus and who would desire to be the guy the Jesus delusion is in accordance with. there have been many saviours wandering the international on the time of Jesus.
2016-11-13 04:06:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by colbert 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, Jesus is mentioned in the bible, the Bavishya Purana of India, The Hindu Puranas, The Razat-us-Safa, the Ikmal-ud-Din, the Tarikh-i-Kashmir, the ancient Chinese document"The History of Religion and Doctrines--The Glass Mirror", the Acta Thomae a Christian work, the Ain-ul-Hayat, and many more.
2007-12-01 07:56:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
if two thirds of the world believes in Him and has done so for the last 2000 years and before that we know He had not been born, that evidence is overwhelming, more that that of the existence of many other people that you take for granted. So maybe you reject what He represents but to deny His existence would make one question your intellectual participation in thought activities.
2007-12-01 07:47:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by peaceisfromgod 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
There is a considerable amount of secular sources which reference Jesus of Nazareth, the Messiah:
TACITUS, a meticulous Roman scholar and historian criticizes a peculiar group by the name of "Christians" (named in honor of Christus, which is Latin for "Christ"), who obey the teachings of a man who suffered under Pontius Pilate in the reign of Tiberius.
SUETONIUS, chief secretary to Emperor Hadrian wrote of a man named "Chrestus" (a Latin variant of Christus) who lived in the first century. (Annals 15.44)
FLAVIUS JOSEPHUS, the most famous Jewish historian. In his Antiquities, he writes about James, "the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ." And also in a controversial verse, 18:3 he says "there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man. For he was one who wrought surprising feats... He was [the] Christ ... he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him." And "... His conduct was good and [he] was known to be virtuous. And many people from among the Jews and the other nations became his disciples. Pilate condemned him to be crucified and to die. But those who became his disciples did not abandon his discipleship. They reported that he had appeared to them three days after his crucifixion, and that he was alive; accordingly he was perhaps the Messiah, concerning whom the prophets have recounted wonders.'"
PLINY THE YOUNGER, in his Letters 10:96, recorded early Christian worship practices including the fact Christians worhipped Jesus as God and were very ethical, and includes a reference to the love feast and Lord's Supper.
THE BABYLONIAN TALMUD (Sanhedrin 43a) confirms Jesus' crucifixion on the eve of Passover, and accusations against Christ for practicing sorcery and encouraging Jewish apostasy.
There are many others... LUCIAN of Samosata; MARA BAR-SERAPION; JULIUS AFRICANUS, including Gnostic writings that mention and confirm Jesus' works and existence.
2007-12-01 07:49:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Outside the Bible, no.
The one contemporary record - Josephus - has been discredited even by the Vatican.
The Bible accounts were written up to three generation after he died, with no written contemporary record, and so have to be suspect. It is even quite possible the entire story is made up - it bears very striking similarities with Mythain stories. Mythacism was prevalent among Roman legionnaires, which is where Christianiy was also first noted.
2007-12-01 07:47:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Gods character is proof
2007-12-01 07:42:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mike D 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Look here:
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=Is+there+proof+that+Jesus+existed&fr=ush-ans
2007-12-01 07:38:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jason 6
·
0⤊
2⤋