How painful is the truth?

Question

I have a friend, let's call him X, he auditioned for Fame Academy.

He also auditioned for Vote For Me, the ITV show to become an MP, but he was deemed too intelligent by the producer of the show.

I am also this friend and invented the fast dial telephone and the keypad will replace QWERTY.

If Gilliam Gibbons is harmed by the authorities or is exposed to risk that leads to harm should we nuke Khartoum?

Answer 1

Please don't tell me the truth, i couldn't handle it.

Answer 2

there is not any existence without painful fact.... how about the painful fact of atheism French Revolution... Stalin... Khmer Rouge... Mao.... the finished estimates are that between 5,000 and 10,000 were killed contained in the Spanish Inquisition. That’s when compared with one hundred MILLION who were killed contained in the ATHEIST purges of the twentieth century. The one hundred MILLION is genuinely a LOW determine, because it makes use of very modest estimates for what number of human beings Stalin and Mao killed, and it leaves out a bunch of lesser atheist tyrants alongside with Pol Pot and Enver Hoxha. nonetheless, utilizing this conservative estimate, a short calculation famous that atheist regimes killed 10000 circumstances better human beings contained in the area of a few a lengthy time period than the Spanish Inquisition managed to kill over a era of better than 2 CENTURIES. precisely WHO imposed the suffering on the human race by ability of INVENTING poison gas, barbed wire, extreme explosives, experiments in eugenics, the formulation for Zyklon B, heavy artillery, pseudo-clinical justifications for mass homicide, cluster bombs, attack submarines, napalm, intercontinental ballistic missiles, protection force area structures, and nuclear guns? If memory serves, it change into no longer faith….

Answer 3

yea! the truth can be painfull. but remember that 90% of truth comes from some one elses perception and has nothing to do with hard reality......having said that, you know where you are with truth. you know how people feel. you know what is in front of you. if your wise! it can lay a path for you to stroll peace fully through your life on. as for Gillian Gibbons. that poor woman will get no real support or protection from the labour party. they are a gutless bunch concerned only with they're own crooked agenda.

Answer 4

Hi there.
The teacher knew what she was doing when she went to Sudan, knew how backward and reactionary they are. She took her chances and we should respect her decision, not interfere.
If we were to nuke Khartoum,it would have to be for something important, like ending the genocide in Darfur region - which those people have had no choice about.
Cheers, Steve.

Answer 5

I am sure that they will respect and release because it's not worth the trouble. As for threats and violence, no way, it just encourages nutcases, like the regime in Kartoum.
Imagine if UK and US did not invade Iraq, we would have oil at 50 dollars a barrel and a more peaceful world. (plus we would be much stronger and more respected).
The truth is less painful than lies.

Answer 6

it depends doesn't it. but i think in the long term, telling the truth in the first place is less painful than lying. cos lies dont last, it just delays the truth. and the longer the truth is delayed the more painful it becomes. and that hat does not look silly it looks amazing. and i think im gonna get me one of them :]

Answer 7

No nukes. The truth is less painful than the where the lies will lead.

Answer 8

truth is never pretty or nice in the end but it is necessary.. as for Mrs Gibbons .. if they harm her we should take out Sudan and deport all Sudanese and Muslims

NO IF ANDS OR BUTS

Answer 9

The truth is painful because people do not want intelligent and honest people fearing that they will be inferior.

Answer 10

The truth is, the hat looks a little silly.

Answer 11

What the hell are you ranting about ? Go away - very far away!