Can A Naked Eye See Anything A Camera Can't?

Answer 1

Sorry I didn't get here earlier.
Draagon took the words right out of my mouth.
Depth. Stereoscopic vision.
A camera "sees" like a person missing one eye sees.
That's also why it's easy to distinguish a painting someone has done from a photograph from one done from life. The "natural" depth your eyes see -- and hand renders -- is gone, and the picture comes out flatter.

Answer 2

In addition to the depth rendered by stereoscopic vision, any camera has significantly less dynamic range than human vision. The best way to explain this is imagine that you and your friend are sitting in the shade on a really bright day. When you look at your friend, you can see both their face in the foreground and the bright background outside the shade. However, if you take a photograph of this situation without using a flash or some other "trick," you will find that if you properly expose the person, the background will be rendered over-exposed (Possibly to the point of being just white). If you properly expose the background, the person will just be a silhouette (or at least very dark).

Much of the body of photographic technique has evolved to deal with the fact that the camera can't see the same dynamic range that human vision can.

Answer 3

Yes, indeed, a naked eye can see things that a camera cannot see, and much depends on how sharp or clever that eye is.

And it is the Eye that directs the camera, and the naked eye can make you more or less mildly more or less justifiably interpret things and see things that the camera can't see,

while a camera is a merciless box, blunt, quite mercilessly objective, and you must take a lot of technical care and add lenses in order to make that camera see, and see better, something that the naked eye is able to see.

Answer 4

diplomacy Coordinator Robyn Broughton says His Holiness particularly wished to have interplay with team and scholars. via fact the skill of St David is constrained to 500 human beings, it improve into desperate to run a contest to compliment which team and scholars can attend – asking what question they might ask the Dalai Lama. the contest closes on Friday 19 April, yet Mrs Broughton says there has been a great reaction already from team around the campus. “we've had entries from around the board,” she says. “applicable from PhD scholars to senior administration.” And the questions conceal a spectrum of matters too. “There are extremely some around the thank you to realize stability in a hectic existence, extremely some around His Holiness’s concepts around the function of tertiary coaching for babies, some around the thank you to stay beneficial, somebody has asked ‘in case you need to be an animal, what might you be?’, yet another has asked ‘what's your popular early existence memory?’.” the ideal inquiries to be positioned to His Holiness would be chosen via the nationwide organiser of the Dalai Lama have confidence, yet Mrs Broughton believes there'll be combination of extreme and extra gentle-hearted questions. Professor Mark Henaghan of regulation will facilitate the consultation and positioned the inquiries to him.

Answer 5

Yes, since a camera can't "see" anything. The camera is just a dumb box, incapable of doing anything.

Answer 6

Depth.
Three dimensions
Stereoscopic vision.

Answer 7

Im definitely sure GHOSTS! sometimes ghost appears in pictures and while a human taking a picture with a camera... a human cant see the ghost by the camera can... (ps can someone answer my question... thanks) but im not sure wat a human can see but a camera cant

Answer 8

yes, different types of glare

Answer 9

yes,

but it can not recall near as well!

:D

good luck!

Answer 10

yeah i guess so