at least with bigfoot we have footprints...
2007-11-30 20:38:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by dr schmitty 7
·
3⤊
5⤋
The Romans were great record keepers and there are records if a man named Jesus coming from Galilee, not spelled right. There is even a entry in a acount sheet stating how much the cross cost. So there evidence of him. Was he what they say he was I can not tell
2007-11-30 20:58:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by raven blackwing 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
actually, theres more evidence that jesus was real than there is proving julius ceazer was real. wether jesus is real or not is a pretty serious matter. before rejecting him, dont you think it would be a good idea to do some studying on the matter ? that way you could at least make an educated descision. and if you still dont beleive in him, at least you would be able to speak intelligntly about it instead of making stupid comments like this.
2007-11-30 20:57:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
You very funny !!
Of course, there is much more evidence for Jesus.
1. If I ask you what date it is today and you answer Dec 1; 2007, you have just acknowledge that Jesus was/is real.
2. If the Bible were removed and the secular historical writings about Jesus were compiled into one book, we would essentially have the same picture of Jesus as that found in the Bible.
2007-11-30 20:54:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by flandargo 5
·
2⤊
4⤋
There is actually quite a bit of evidence for Bigfoot.
EDIT: Oh look at that, Alfalfa and WC Fields on the same page. We are adding class to the joint.
2007-11-30 20:37:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
Remember all those times Butch was gonna stomp a mud hole in your @$$ and didn't.....Divine Intervention
and Sasquatch isn't divine.............
2007-11-30 20:38:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Eye of Innocence 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
If you even think that is serious, or funny, then you don't know much about History or Christianity.
2007-11-30 20:40:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Wire Tapped 6
·
3⤊
4⤋