Which is better Canon EOS 40D or Nikon D40X or HQ Grade: B?

Answer 1

HQ Grade: B.. I think you were looking at reviews here:
http://www.digitalcamera-hq.com

Other good sites for detailed camera reviews is here:
http://www.dpreview.com/

These are different product lines, so simply put, the Canon EOS 40D is much nicer than the Nikon D40X. It's supposed to be. The 40D is the latest digital in Canon's "mid-range" line of cameras, while the D40x is the latest entry-level DSLR in Nikon's lineup.

There are more apt comparisons. The D40X is basically comparable to the Canon Digital Rebel XTi (400D in Europe), both consumer priced cameras, both with 10Mpixel sensors, both fairly small for SLR type cameras.

And moving up to low-end pro/prosumer models, the Canon 40D is on par with the Nikon D300. The Nikon's 12 Mpixel sensor edges out the Canon's 10 Mpixel sensor, but that's not the only basis for comparison. Both of these are built more rugged than their consumer counterparts, they have metal bodies and seals against moisture, deeper RAM buffers (more frames in a burst of photos), etc.

Yes, Canon uses 3-digit numbers for their low-end DSLRs, two for their mid-range; Nikon uses three digit numbers for their mid-range, two for the low-end. They both use single-digits for the pro models.

Anyway, I could easily recommend any of these cameras, and I'd have a hard time recommending anything other than Canon or Nikon for a DSLR... together, they cover something like 80% of that market. I own Canon film and digital SLRs, and a few Nikon film SLRs. My Dad has the Nikon D70 and D80.

I would recommend reading the reviews and actually handling these cameras in person. It probably will come down to which model fits your tastes the best, and of course, your budget. Of course, if you have a stash of Canon EOS lenses, or pretty much any Nikon SLR lens ever made, the decision might be a bit easier.

Also, keep in mind, when you invest in an SLR system, you are investing in a SYSTEM. There are additional lenses, intelligent flash units, all kinds of things. Both Canon and Nikon have long records of supporting this, and have very extensive lines of gear. No one else really compares, so if these things matter to you (or may some day), it may be worth taking a look at their product lines.

Answer 2

The Canon 40D is a much more expensive camera and probably should be compared to the D80 or D200.

If you mean the Canon 400D, also called the Rebel XTi, then that's equivalent to the D40x, and you should pick the camera that feels better in your hand.

I'm not sure what you mean by HQ Grade: B, but maybe you'll do better in school next time.

Answer 3

If you're a beginner, you're most likely asking yourself: Nikon or Canon? Really, I feel confident in saying that you can't go wrong with either. I've used both brand's cameras extensively and find that they both offer amazing image quality with well-built, solid cameras that, if taken care of, will last decades. There are two differences between the cameras, though, that can be taken into consideration. The user-interface: If cameras were computers, Nikons would be PCs and Canons would be MACs. PCs are built for people not afraid of technology whereas Macs are built for people who want things super-easy. Nikons excel at customization options which means you'll see so many more options with the Advanced features of a Nikon than you will with a Canon. Canons, on the other hand, excel at ease-of-use for beginners. Canons offer less advanced options and can be easier to learn on. This can be frustrating down the line, though, once you've learned a lot about photography. At that point you may want all of the options that Nikon offers and be frustrated with your Canon. If you're someone who really likes to delve deep into your hobbies or if you're intent on becoming a professional photographer, I'd say a Nikon would be your best bet. If you're someone who wants to learn the basics of photography and only imagine yourself being a hobbyist, Canon would be a better option for you. Where Nikon 5200 excels: Flash photography. I often find myself in situations where I'm shooting event photography (weddings, movie premiers, benefits and galas) where I need to use a lot of flash. For this kind of photography, I'll always prefer to be shooting with a Nikon. Nikon's flash metering (how the camera magically decides how much light to fire out of the flash) is much more consistent than Canon's. You can take a Canon and shoot the same scene three times in a row with flash and all three images will be at different brightness levels. You can do the same thing with a Nikon and all three images will be wonderfully the same. If you're somebody who plans on shooting a lot with flash (indoor photography, event photography, etc.) you'll want to consider going with Nikon. Where Canon EOS 60D excels: Richness of colors. I've been in numerous situations where I've been on the red carpet taking the exact same picture as the photographer next to me. I'll have a Canon and the person next to me will have a Nikon. This has provided quite a few opportunities to compare the images side-by-side. What I've found is that the colors on the Canon's images look richer and make the image pop more. If I'm doing fine art photography (anything I'd like to someday hang in a gallery), I'll always want to be shooting with a Canon for this reason.

Answer 4

i dubb what is hq grade, but 40d is costing alot more than d40x, i think u mean 400d or xti. if you can afford 40d might as well compare to nikon D300. Depend on you camera skills, if you beginner to manual control or DSLR, Nikon is better choice because has tips and incamera edit also better grip over canon, but canon has better lens (but result higher price too), also canon has more third party lens over nikon. You should try them both.

Answer 5

Canon and Nikon are both fine cameras. However, IMO, you should at least look at the Pentax K100D, K100D Super and K10D.

Pentax has the Image Stabilization (IS) in the camera body. Every K-mount lens ever made since the introduction of the K-mount with the K1000 35mm film camera will mount to the new Pentax DSLR line. That gives you access to a lot of quality glass. You'll have to manually focus them but at least they can take advantage of the IS.

The K100D & K100D Super are both 6.1mp; the Super added dust removal for the sensor. The K10D is 10mp and has dust removal. If you can live with 6.1mp then you should find some bargain prices on the K100D cameras.

So why limit yourself?

Answer 6

I heard that Canon EOS 40D is better. Check these links for more information, which should help you decide, http://www.retrevo.com/s/Canon-40D-Digital-Cameras-review-manual/id/3114bh931/t/1-2/
http://www.retrevo.com/s/Nikon-D40x-Digital-Cameras-review-manual/id/2488ag816/t/1-2/
http://www.retrevo.com/s/HQ+Grade%3A+B

Answer 7

well, i think you get what you paid for. but i like Nikon D300. for some reason, if you buy the same camera in overseas like east of Asia. it costs you much less than here. something like couple of hundreds cheaper. it's just great. i wonder how many people buy electronics from overseas?