English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If there was no God and science could explain everything, shouldn't they try to research THAT? You know why you control this particular body while that person there controls that particular body. Not to mention all the other animals in the world.

2007-11-30 20:09:03 · 12 answers · asked by ? 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Think about it. Why are you inside your own body and not in another one across the world somewhere or not inside an animal. I know it's deep but the question is fathomable.

2007-11-30 20:15:44 · update #1

12 answers

We call that Biology and Psychology.

2007-11-30 20:12:51 · answer #1 · answered by Dashes 6 · 1 0

My name ;)

2016-04-07 01:18:25 · answer #2 · answered by Jane 4 · 0 0

People are their bodies.
There is no person before their body exists.

Who you are is directly connected with genetics and what has influenced you in your environment.
What you are incinuating is that there is a soul that is made and then distributed to bodies as if thats what gives them their process of thought.
There is no proof of a soul or anything like that.
All abstract gibberish.

2007-11-30 20:15:46 · answer #3 · answered by Clint 4 · 1 0

Uhm, you haven't heard our particular bodies form as a result of our parents' genes mixing after sex?

Already answered.

2007-11-30 20:11:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

So you are suggesting research into alien possession to see who or what is living in you and your dog? Sounds like a waste of time.

2007-11-30 20:13:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Uh, it's already been found! It's called the Holy spirit of GOD. He is real.

2007-11-30 20:11:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

you cell phone is composed of molecules , you call it a phone the molecules could have been part of a star as well.

come back when you have thought about this.

2007-11-30 20:15:42 · answer #7 · answered by gjmb1960 7 · 0 0

Why should there be a scientific name for incoherant junk?

2007-11-30 20:11:24 · answer #8 · answered by heidavey 5 · 1 0

Sounds like "incarnation".


Defined on http://www.thefreedictionary.com/incarnate as:

"Invested with bodily nature and form: an incarnate spirit."

"To give bodily, especially human, form to."

"To personify."

2007-11-30 20:14:08 · answer #9 · answered by Jokin' Jo 3 · 0 0

umm i don't get what you saying.your trying to mix random ideology with fact

2007-11-30 20:12:41 · answer #10 · answered by Shelby L 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers