Aren't there any real scientific articles on the Internet to support your position (ones without religious bias)? You certainly don't see creationist propoganda in the science section of Yahoo! News.
2007-11-30
17:13:24
·
16 answers
·
asked by
Alex H
5
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Prince: Yahoo! is an atheist website? http://news.yahoo.com/i/2078;_ylt=Al62wp8f46UMHaDcfeDEFwUPLBIF
2007-11-30
17:20:01 ·
update #1
**ME**: Right. And I suppose that 85% of the U.S. is just faking their belief in God. Where do you get this crap from?
2007-11-30
17:22:32 ·
update #2
No, there aren't any real scientific articles that support a creationist position. That's why they have to stick to weird Christian science.
2007-11-30 17:16:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Linz VT•AM 4
·
3⤊
2⤋
i think of that's because of the fact the Jews understand that their god is greater suitable, smarter and plenty greater in a position than the christian god. The christian god is possible thoroughly incapable of arising a mechanism during which the universe variations. Christians don't think their god is able to putting at the same time something as complicated as Branes, String concept, vast Bang, Evolution, Abiogenesis etc etc. The christian god is possible so vulnerable and uncreative, that s/he had to easily create the tip result unexpectedly, and is merely too afraid to truly enable his/her creation develop. Jews on the different hand believe that their god is innovative, confident and robust. they believe that their god could have created the universe and existence, any damn way s/he chosen to, which includes probably those techniques suggested above. So there is truly no clarification for them to place up the forms of fake 'proofs' that such countless of the christians opt for to do. They understand the information approximately their gods techniques exist already in the technological awareness journals.
2016-10-09 23:47:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by xie 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Serious study of the scientific facts, not fancifull theories, will reveal what most of the creation web sights portray. Truth. You my poor man just must have the courage to believe it. Some day you will have to answer to the Creator for your unbelief, and what answer will you give to him? ... "well Sir, I didnt believe because there was no creationist propoganda on Yahoo News? " Come to Christ
2007-11-30 17:35:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Well, there aren't really scientific articles that support evolutionist propaganda. In fact science actually shows that creation is far more likely than evolution, but this is usually suppressed because people don't WANT to believe in a God.
2007-11-30 17:20:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
same reason atheists usually post links to atheists websites. It supports their position.
edit: Yahoo is obvioulsy atheist. You don't see any human skeletons along side those dinosaurs do you? An obvious cover up by those bone planting atheists.
2007-11-30 17:16:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by going postal 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
They are assuming the ones interested are Atheists or Agnostic and have done their side of the research. Most kids today are taught about evolution, but nothing about how there's absolutely no proof to back it up. Creationist websites provide real science.
That being said, please read or watch the DVD for Lee Stroble's The Case For A Creator. IT WILL BLOW YOUR MIND!
2007-11-30 17:21:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by SpaceGirl009 2
·
0⤊
4⤋
because they get all their information on those sights. if they were to actually look at credible science websites they wouldnt have to rely on half the story. but i guess thats where we come in.
2007-11-30 17:34:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by god_of_the_accursed 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because that's the only sites that agree with them. To be fair, Evolutionist only link to sites that agree with them as well.
2007-11-30 17:31:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by punch 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Internet, the reliable source....LMFAO
2007-11-30 17:17:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
i really want to know what is creationist means..
or what are you referring to..
2007-11-30 17:16:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by ♠ jhun ♠ 6
·
0⤊
0⤋