So?
In light of the complete lack of evidence for such a being, we atheists are on firm ground in our beliefs. Believers can't say the same.
2007-11-30 16:08:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
1⤋
No, but then I can't (and neither can you) prove that Santa, the Easter Bunny and Zeus don't exist.
The supreme being is a concept that cannot be proven either way. Without any basis for proof, one falls on logic and deductive reasoning. The atheists here deduce that your explanation and descriptions of God are bunk with plenty of reasonable rationale but no proof.
I can respect that you disagree but since you cannot prove His existence, you are morally barred from criticizing those who cannot prove non-existence. You are like GW Bush, sitting on the worlds largest stockpile of WMDs and using fictitious WMDs in Iraq as grounds to invade that country.
2007-11-30 16:24:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by davster 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well you you can't prove a negative, unless you index the entire universe. However you can make a rational assessment of the probability and that Richard Dawkin does very well in his book "The God Delusion".
I actually believe that the truth was revealed by Steven Spielberg in his famous series "Star Wars", these movies provide solid evidence that aliens existed and that the Dark Side is real. His sacred films are so much more tangible than the bible, you can actually see what happened.....YOU RELIGIONISTS CANNOT PROVE ME WRONG!!!!!
2007-11-30 16:22:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
"Shifting of burden of proof". Look it up under "logical fallacies".
But, here goes anyway:
P1- An all loving creator would want to enter into as deep a relationship as possible with "his" creatures.
P2- If this being is also all powerful, any attempt to approach "him" would work.
P3- Intellectual inquiry into the possibility of a creator is an attempt to enter into a reltionship (to know) said being
C1- Therefore, reasoned disbelief in an all loving, all powerful, existing creator should be impossible
P4- reasoned disbelief does exist
C2 Therefore, we are left with 3 possiblities:
(i) No such being exists
(ii) There is a creator, but "he" is not all loving
(iii) There is a creator, but "he" is not all powerful
Any of the possibilities falling under C2 rules out an Abrahamic deity. QED
2007-11-30 16:22:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by neil s 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Atheists technically do no longer could desire to tutor something. Atheism is real by using default until somebody proves that a god exists. no one has completed this. notwithstanding, right it is a information with regard to the nonexistence of Yahweh and Allah, in 4 paragraphs: there is not any solid information for Jesus, Yahweh, Allah, Zeus, Thor, or any of the loads of alternative gods that persons have worshipped. there is likewise extensive information that they are all purely myths, created to assist soothe our concern of dying, and perpetuated via faith to subjugate the underclass into obedience. technology has shown that there is not any choose for gods to describe the classic reasons for a god -- foundation of the universe, foundation of existence, foundation of species, foundation of human beings, foundation of morality. technology additionally shows us the psychological reasons that persons have self assurance in god(s). If a god like Yahweh or Allah existed there could be show information. No such information exists, hence those gods do no longer exist. Yahweh and Allah additionally are internally and externally incongruent, and for this reason can't logically exist. An all-powerful and omniscient god with unfastened will can no longer exist, because of the fact it may desire to no longer the two understand the destiny and alter it. An all-powerful and omnibenevolent god can no longer exist and permit the real horrors that happen to sentient beings.
2016-10-18 10:58:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Can you Christians prove that the Creator of the heavens and earth does exist! NO you CANT......?
2007-11-30 16:41:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
What a silly question. Atheists are not trying to claim that something exists for which there is no tangible or reliable evidence to prove its existence. Atheists do not prove that god does not exist, they ask, that if you believe in something, it is your responsibility to prove it exists. However, they prove the various fallacies and infelicities presented within various religious belief systems, and that in all likelihood, the god and the faith you believe in is nothing more than a combination of mythology and cultural constructions.
2007-11-30 16:16:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ivor L 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
lol u really mad them hot with this one... and they want to turn it around to say we can't prove nothing about beliefs! LOL Look around and read the Holy Bible and it's proof enough! 1 time i asked a question that 90% of the pop. believes in a creator and the atheist said yea also 90% of the world believed the world was flat once too! But it says in the Bible that the world is round!
2007-11-30 16:17:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Is this a question or a statement? I agree, atheists can't disprove gods existence (for that matter nobody can). Likewise, the opposite is true. There are no empirical means to verify Gods existence. The question is resolved through faith alone
2007-11-30 16:11:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by marc m 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Let this non-believer look at it from your point of veiw. Lets say there are 100 religions in this world and each one is up on high preaching that theirs is the "only religion and god". So numerically there is in the minds of that "one" religion that they (possibly) being correct is in fact 1% right and the "other 99%" being incorrect. this gives anyone convinced enought to beleive in something that cannot be seen a 99% chance of being slightly less than being 100% totally wrong about something that cannot be proven. 1% to be Truly Correct are huge great odds stacked against you and gives you better odds of being 99% wrong!
2007-12-01 21:28:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by munro5112 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is simply no need to work towards disproving something that provides absolutely no evidence to prove otherwise. In other words, you can't prove a negative.
2007-11-30 16:13:06
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋