which one is pure and error free
and which one matches with todays science
2007-11-30 13:51:34 · 14 answers · asked by basith_002 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
bible comes no where near to science and it has errors many
example see
Genesis 32:30 or John 1:18
Genesis 37:28 or Genesis 37:36
Mark 15:20-22 or Luke 9:3
2007-11-30 14:16:42 · answer #1 · answered by alee 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
i dont think that bible comes near to science but quran has many things that matches with todays science.
In errors bible deals with it many and many errors r there in it
but the quran is error free and it is here as it was in the time of prophet mohammed
2007-11-30 22:07:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Quran.
2007-11-30 22:31:31 · answer #3 · answered by yo189 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Nothing is error-free -- including science. The devil sees to it that error creeps into everything. That said, I'll take the Bible over the Qur'an or science any day. God guarantees that He will keep His Word clear enough for those whom choose to find Him and for those whom choose to follow Him.
Proof that even the Bible is not free from perceived error? The translators incorrectly used the Greek pagan concepts of the "spirit," "soul," and "hell" when translating the Bible into English. Overcoming this error is as simple as (1) knowing God's Character, or (2) cross-referencing with other statements in God's Words, or (3) going back to the original language.
Thus, hell is not currently a real place. Also, we have neither a spirit nor a soul -- in the spiritual sense. We *are* a living soul -- we don't *have* one (Gen. 2:7; 1Cor. 15:45). The Bible formula for a living soul:
Dust of the Ground + Breath of Life = A Living Soul
We also don't *have* the spiritual concept of a "spirit." The word "ruÌach" translated in the Bible into the English word "spirit" (Eccl 12:7) is referring to the Breath of Life given to us by God.
H7307 (ר×Ö¼×) ruÌach (roo'-akh)
From H7306; wind; by resemblance breath, that is, a sensible (or even violent) exhalation;
H7306 (ר×Ö¼×) ruÌach (roo'-akh)
A primitive root; properly to blow, that is, breathe;
Without the Breath, we are just plain dead -- back to the Dust of the Ground (Gen. 3:19; Psalms 104:29). The Bible formula for death:
A Living Soul - Breath of Life = Dust of the Ground
Jesus does promise us an after-life, though. For more Bible information on this topic, see the following references.
2007-11-30 22:00:30 · answer #4 · answered by ♫DaveC♪♫ 7 · 2⤊ 6⤋
BISMILLAH HIRRAHMAN NIRRAHEEM,
QURAAN IS PURE AND ERROR FREE WHITH ITS ARABIC WORDING NOT BY TRANSLATION, BECAUSE ALLAH SAYS IN QURRAN THAT "I HAS ANZALNA QURAANA IN AARABI AND ITS SAVE IN LOWHEY MAHFOOZ". BASE OF THE SCIENCE IS QURAAN ONLY, ITS TELLS US ALL SCIENTIC REASONS OF ALLAH'S CREATIONS, AND THE RESON OF DESTROY IT. ITS A COMPLETE GUIDE HOLY BOOK FOR EVER UNTILL QIYAMATH [LAST DAY OF THIS UNIVERSE "VERY SCARE DAY", (MAY ALLAH SAVE US ALL MOMINEEN AND MOMINAAT, MUISLIMEEN AND MUSLIMAAT FROM THIS DAY, AAMEEN.)] WILL COME.
2007-12-01 02:37:33 · answer #5 · answered by nasha fatima 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Forget science. The Holy Bible is correct. Jesus is the way, the light, and the truth.
2007-11-30 22:05:08 · answer #6 · answered by Zach 1 · 2⤊ 6⤋
Both are important but both have been tainted with the translations and interpretations of man. Take the messages of peace and love and do not quibble over the small print.
2007-11-30 21:59:29 · answer #7 · answered by Topaz 2 · 1⤊ 6⤋
A correct view of science always agrees with a correct view of the Bible.
When they appeared in the past, not to match up, all you had to wait a few years for science to catch up.
Remember that today's science is not yet perfect.
Pastor Art
2007-11-30 21:55:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 9⤋
King James Version....... How else could it survive over 400 years exactly the same when so many tried to destroy it in the beginning?
2007-11-30 21:59:00 · answer #9 · answered by shaggy's mom 1 · 1⤊ 6⤋
the bible is pure
2007-11-30 22:03:04 · answer #10 · answered by c.pearce44 2 · 2⤊ 5⤋