English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-11-30 08:33:00 · 15 answers · asked by pi n 1 in Environment Global Warming

15 answers

We shouldn't. 10 years from now you'll see no difference from what we have today.

2007-11-30 09:10:14 · answer #1 · answered by Dr Jello 7 · 1 2

There is a fine line between believing global warming exists or it doesn't. There are scientists and pollutions for both sides out trying to push their view. The way I look at it is that it is obvious we aren't doing the environment much good when we are causing pollution, making huge nasty landfills and tearing down trees. The current increase in global warming could be related to human activity or it could be a natural cycle of the earth. Either way I am doing what I can by recycling and conserving fuels to do my part in making this a better place to live. Pollution isn't healthy for anyone so regardless of what you believe do what's right to make the world around you a little bit cleaner.

2007-11-30 16:43:45 · answer #2 · answered by mac_attack_51 3 · 0 0

we should be concerned because soon global warming can lead to us having no fall or spring and later no winter and then we would have summer all year long and it can cause many millions of deaths and pollution which could end the world..... think about that and next time dont use us for answers use your own ****** head

2007-11-30 20:48:32 · answer #3 · answered by Adrian 2 · 1 0

Because we're fortunate enough to be alive when humans have the luxury to worry about such inconsequential theories.

Luxury brought on, ironically, by the very technology that we're supposed to shut down because it's killing us...


ADDENDUM - One responder, suffering from a particularly acute form of Global Warming Hysteria, writes:

"The monsoons of Asia could either intensify, bringing flooding on a biblical scale, or they could weaken to the point of being non-existent, which would lead to a biblical-scale drought that would lead to starvation for MILLIONS."

We "deniers" couldn't have conceived a more poignant example of this movement's ability to claim that ANY weather anomaly is the result of selfish human activity.

Thank you!

2007-11-30 17:22:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

well we should be worried about global warming because by 2010 - 20?? we will have level 5 super typhoons

2007-12-01 07:47:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Jello-face, excuse me I mean " Dr. Jello", can I have your phone number so I can call you in ten years to laugh at your current ignorance?

We should be very concerned. Our current climate is very fragile, whole region's climates could drastically change with the slightest deviation in wind patterns or ocean currents.

More trapped energy in the atmosphere, i.e. heat, means certain natural weather cycles that depends on a delicate balance of energy will be thrown off. The monsoons of Asia could either intensify, bringing flooding on a biblical scale, or they could weaken to the point of being non-existent, which would lead to a biblical-scale drought that would lead to starvation for MILLIONS. This is just one example.

Along with the nearly unpredictable changes in wind patterns, ocean currents, el nino and el nina cycles, and tropical convergence zones, are the very predictable rise in floods and wildfires, along with a likely increase in hurricane intensity, which we are probably already witnessing.

On top of all this, the accompanying increase in melting and calving of ice sheets could begin to rise sea levels to dangerous new heights, potentially swamping very low-lying areas of the world, such as Bangladesh, which has a population of 300 million people living barely a few feet above sea level. The potential rise of a few feet in sea level over the next decades would inundate the rice fields with salt-water, leading to mass famine and migration. The flood of refugees into neighboring countries could set off ethnic conflict and genocide.

It isn't going to be pretty..

2007-11-30 17:23:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Just about 2 -3 weeks ago I heard about the first island (close to Sti-Lanks) that was evacuated because the ocean level started to be threatening and people's lives were in danger.
Those people who left their homes and lands are now planet's first immigrants on environmental reasons.

2007-11-30 18:47:06 · answer #7 · answered by ovi.schi 1 · 1 0

It won't be a Hollywood movie style disaster. Gradually coastal areas will flood and agriculture will be damaged. But it will be very bad. Rich countries will cope, but it will take huge amounts of money. In poor countries many people will die of starvation, but not all of them.

Most scientists say, in 20-50 years. But we need to start right now to fix it, fixing it will take even longer than that.

Really good website for more information here:

http://profend.com/global-warming/

2007-11-30 16:47:32 · answer #8 · answered by Bob 7 · 1 2

bcuz in 300 hudred yrs if were all still here it will create a massive reaction causing major earth quakes,tsumanmis ect. and our generations to come will perish

2007-11-30 17:11:52 · answer #9 · answered by miss.mafia 2 · 0 0

Because scientists have said that it's going to cause many problems such as increased droughts, heat waves, floods, stronger hurricanes, rising sea levels, etc. etc.

2007-11-30 16:44:15 · answer #10 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 2 3