The primary answer you'll get is blitzkrieg, or lightning war. This type of warfare was to find a weak point in your enemies defenses, to pour through it, and to continue assaulting such that your enemy couldn't entrench themselves in a proper defense. Actually, the nazi armies showed the effective nature of these kinds of tactics and modern armies use blitz tactics to this day.
Second, he used a diplomatic strategy for awhile as well. After invading a country he would go dormant, insisting it was justified and that Germany wouldn't do it again. He fooled a lot of people and by the time the french even figured out what was coming the Germans were rounding the top of their defenses and driving towards Paris.
Third, he employed (then) modern air tactics. The german airforce was a rugged, battleproven force. The german army repeatedly established air superiority, allowing them freedom of movement and denying it to their enemies. Fortunately that projection into England was difficult at the time due to technology, otherwise england may have faltered in the battle for london.
Finally (for what i'm going to write here) Germany more or less wrote the book on WWII tank warfare, employing troops and armor together in ways that hadn't been seen before (remember, no tanks in WWI).
2007-11-30 03:28:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by promethius9594 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I also have a somewhat distinctive handle appeasement to fairly some the answerers so some distance. i do no longer think of that our legislators have been naive sufficient to think of that conflict could desire to be prevented - fairly it became right into a stalling tactic because of the fact there's a protracted lead-time required to construct up a well-liked mechanised military. The extra time that could desire to be offered the extra arranged we'd be for conflict. The French, on the different hand, set super shop by using their Maginot Line which Hitler fairly prevented by using flying over the right and invading around it via Belgium
2016-10-18 09:42:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
blitzkrieg, german word for "lightning war" they rushed in before the country could rally a defence, that was a good idea, but Hitler was not a strategist, while fighting the allies on the west and south front, he decided to open a third fron with Russian, whom they had signed a non-aggression pact. The russain winter and fortified cities killed 3 millin german troops
2007-11-30 00:59:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ba12348 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Well firstly he became allies with soviet and korea! He got tired of the russians and made war between them as he stays with koreans. He wanted to control and is the infamous person for most genocide cause of his hate for the jews. The u.s. stayed away from them until korea launched an attack on pearl harbor where the u.s. bombed korea. So he might have done an airdrop or stealth when taking over but that ain't his plans of using stealth...he used the german army strentgh.
2007-11-30 02:04:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by srgt.martinez 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
The blitz
2007-11-30 08:49:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Wayner 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
He killed a lot of Indians.He also had a lot of enslaved people with him to help take over. If they didnt get the land they wanted they would start a war. Hitler won most of his wars until he died in one. Hope this helps.
2007-11-30 00:58:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Albert the Gator 2
·
0⤊
4⤋
I think he used the"killing" strategy.
2007-11-30 00:57:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Blitzkrieg-didn't work in Russia!
2007-11-30 01:41:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by michinoku2001 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Blitzkreig.
Pre emptive strike.
2007-11-30 00:57:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Actually he had a Japanese ally, not Korean.
2007-11-30 02:18:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋