2007-11-29 14:45:36 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Please give me in-depth answers and reasons! Thanks!
2007-11-29 14:47:48 · update #1
A country, in and of itself, cannot be labeled as competent.
Competency is a descriptive word assigned to individuals, as in, "Wow, she sure is competent in Scrabble."
A leader can be competent, or incompetent.
I consider President Bush to be highly incompetent, yet America is filled with people that you would consider to be competent.
Unanswerable question.
2007-11-29 14:51:39 · answer #1 · answered by powhound 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Individuals can be competent - heck, individuals can be brilliant. Small tightly knit teams can be compent. Larger groups of individuals can only achieve mediocrity. Whole countries are grossly incompetent and mind-bogglingly stupid. Leadership typically only compounds the problem.
2007-11-29 22:58:07 · answer #2 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The People. If a country is to be free, it is up to the People to make it successful, not the Government.
Free People making the most out of their opportunities.
2007-11-29 23:39:37 · answer #3 · answered by Jon M 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Democracy. The government not lying to its people. Basically the opposite of everything Bush has done since 2001.
2007-11-29 22:51:51 · answer #4 · answered by Senator D*L*P™ 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It's leadership, it's foreign policy and it's domestic policy.
2007-11-30 07:05:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
what else?? good leadership, and good people!!!!!
2007-11-29 22:48:50 · answer #6 · answered by poopsie 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋