I could expound on this but sometimes a simple line of truth is more effective.
2007-11-29 13:34:14 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
We do.
"We must stop thinking of the individual and start thinking about what is best for society." [Hillary Clinton, 1993]
"It is thus necessary that the individual should come to realize that his own ego is of no importance in comparison with the existence of his nation; that the position of the individual ego is conditioned solely by the interests of the nation as a whole ... that above all the unity of a nation's spirit and will are worth far more than the freedom of the spirit and will of an individual. .... This state of mind, which subordinates the interests of the ego to the conservation of the community, is really the first premise for every truly human culture .... we understand only the individual's capacity to make sacrifices for the community, for his fellow man." [Adolph Hitler, 1933]
The main plank in the National Socialist program is to abolish the liberalistic concept of the individual and the Marxist concept of humanity and to substitute for them the folk community, rooted in the soil and bound together by the bond of its common blood." [Adolph Hitler, quoted in Hitler, A Study in Tyranny, by Alan Bullock (Harper Collins, NY)]
Comrades! We must abolish the cult of the individual decisively, once and for all." [Nikita Khrushchev , February 25, 1956 20th Congress of the Communist Party]
"All our lives we fought against exalting the individual, against the elevation of the single person, and long ago we were over and done with the business of a hero, and here it comes up again: the glorification of one personality. This is not good at all." [Vladimir Lenin, as quoted in Not by Politics Alone]
Fascist ethics begin ... with the acknowledgment that it is not the individual who confers a meaning upon society, but it is, instead, the existence of a human society which determines the human character of the individual. According to Fascism, a true, a great spiritual life cannot take place unless the State has risen to a position of pre-eminence in the world of man. The curtailment of liberty thus becomes justified at once, and this need of rising the State to its rightful position. [Mario Palmieri, "The Philosophy of Fascism" 1936]
See a common thread in these statements?
2007-11-29 13:36:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 6⤋
YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT A COMMUNIST IS..
THAT IS ABUNDANTLY CORRECT.
Please look up the word communist and get back and tell me how she is a communist.
========= more ========
Communism, socialism and capitalism are economic models and can exist in monarchies, dictatorships, totalitarian, fascism, theocracies, and democracies. Albeit, communism and socialism has more in common with totalitarian, dictatorships and fascists.
There are a lot more examples of government types, those are the top few.
===========
Communism, socialism, and capitalism does not mean freedom. Pure forms of all three are anything but freedom for the people. Communism reduces people to worker ants, socialism puts all manufacturing and services in the hands of the state, capitalism puts all manufacturing and services in the hands of the elite.
I believe, controlled capitalism for unneeded services and socialism for needed services is the best of all worlds. Uncontrolled capitalism is as repressive to the people as a dictatorship or fascism. The reason is simple, people are greedy by human nature.
With the exception of Universal Health Care in this country, needed services are socialistic. Albeit, we do have Universal health care in this country for our federal leaders and military. The federal leaders get the best of Universal health care, the military is underfunded.
Another tid bit to ponder, we provide universal health care to Iraq and Afghanistan.
=============
Peace
Jim
2007-11-29 13:46:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Thinks you're way off base. If anything Hillary is in many ways a far more old time Goldwater conservative than most of the current batch of Repub candidates.
2007-11-29 13:48:44 · answer #3 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
She hides what she really is... just like a good Socialist.
Communists are at least proud of what they are.
Hillary Clinton will never be President because too many of us see her for what she is...despite all the smoke and mirrors, and all the mindless sheaple who cant see through her carefully crafted phony image...
There are a good deal of us who have common sense and know a skunk when we smell one.
2007-11-29 13:43:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
We all know it. The Republicans despise her for it and the democrats idolize her for it. We all know it.
The reason that her plan is for "universal health care" is because "Socialized Medicine" is the term they have used in Communist countries for decades. Socialists are Communists
2007-11-29 13:39:40 · answer #5 · answered by t. B 5 · 5⤊ 5⤋
Marx did indicate capitalism leads to communism.
2007-11-29 13:38:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
The foolish ones already do.
The intelligent ones see her as more of the same, much like our current Globalist President.
2007-11-29 13:40:06 · answer #7 · answered by Think 1st 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
If she were a republican then the country might consider your slander to have some merit.
2007-11-29 13:39:45 · answer #8 · answered by Bud W 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
We do well, atleast most of us do! im a kid and i realize it!
2007-11-29 13:53:21 · answer #9 · answered by milkshake 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Because the people who support her would have to admit to their communist leanings
2007-11-29 13:37:34 · answer #10 · answered by freeatlast2200 3 · 5⤊ 6⤋