That the US would be justified in pursuing military options against Iran?

Question

PLEASE GIVE ME ANY USEFUL THOUGHTS AND/OR RESOURCES WHY OR WHY NOT. pleaseee help!

Answer 1

No. Iran has attacked nobody. Other than internal propoganda, Iran has threatened nobody. Enriching their own nuclear material makes perfect sense since they have reactors and they have ore.

Answer 2

Since the marine reduced the order of V-vehicles (or bomb resist vehicles), the military action would be, at most, bombing Iran once for all. That means, U.S. will not send troops to Iran in foreseeable future

Answer 3

I think we'll just hit them with a few sanctions tha won't do much good. They are used to living on an Isolated economy that has develope over the last 28 years.

The EU will feel the hit worse than anyone.

Answer 4

The only military option the U.S. should consider against Iran is the nuclear one.

Answer 5

Don't even go here: we want our men and women home and, now. Where ever your from, send your own people, it's been four years now, some of our people haven't been home in three. It's ruining families, relationships and children. If you want to go so bad, join up.

Answer 6

for an confirmation to this question u might desire to show out that if we simply by fact the U. S. doesnt bypass forward and bounce in in this then israel will after which the entire center east will would be in an uproar, and we can be blamed for it. ( David C. hELWICH, analyze for paradigm analyze) . as quickly as they have nuclear weapons, not one of the sanctions we've or might have wont artwork as a result militia action is our in basic terms selection. To negate it... Iran wont have nuclear weapons every time quickly , as a result threats are exaggerated. It takes a lengthy time to make those issues so that's logically impossible for them to be making the threats that they are being accused of ,especially when you consider that they dont formally have nuclear weapons. There are different effective thoughts, sure international peace is one that contains recommendations in spite of the undeniable fact that we arent in a elegance pagent. in spite of the undeniable fact that dis making an investment ourselves in Iran could help us greater desirable than attacking them. at present the rugmarket is skyrocketing that's in fact partly simply by embargo being lifted in 2000. issues like that should be eradicated to that end arising much less of our might desire to be in good with iran. Intelligence gaps is yet another vast factor to hit on, we are in basic terms working on a organic hear- say of the place those "nuclear weapons" are. Iran is a extensive united states of america, so in basic terms getting into there and attacking with a achievement and pass over thought is obviously unwise. yet another important venture to submit to in recommendations whilst debating that's that that's our government against theirs. i understand for a actuality that Iranian human beings for the main section love individuals, and till that's a private journey maximum individuals have not have been given something agains Iranian human beings. So the hatred we hear of Iranian's for us is what the government is feeding us, AND vice versa. i'm at present nonetheless discovering this aswell the rest i discover i nicely enable u understand approximately. in case you have any questions be at liberty to touch me . good success inclusive of your debate.

Answer 7

Let's hope the line of communication will evolve before talk of war.

Answer 8

Sooner or later, someone is going to be forced to deal with them.
People are going to perish.
The question is, which people. ?

Answer 9

for what? we should stop creating more problems for ourselves

Answer 10

http://www.publicforumfiles.co.nr/