In an interview Salvador Dali stated those were his political beliefs. Though obviously to some extent it was a way to confuse and schock the interviewer but how would this political system work? Theoretically.
2007-11-29 12:46:47 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
It seems like an oxymoron to me. The only way such a system could exist would be if the monarch were a figurehead only, with no legislative or executive powers. Presumably in an anarchy there would be no taxes, so the monarch would have to be independently wealthy as well. His only real function would be as a symbol of the nation, like a flag.
2007-11-29 12:58:48 · answer #1 · answered by R[̲̅ə̲̅٨̲̅٥̲̅٦̲̅]ution 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Every man for himself, every man a king."
Montaigne's three basic systems of government apply: monarchy, aristocracy (aka oligarchy as "might makes best"), and democracy.
SD's "anarcho" is simply democracy, which is antinomial to monarchy. He was combining apples and oranges to try to make lemonade.
You might enjoy "A Philosophy of Universality" and "Creation: Artistic and Spiritual," O. M. Aivanhov, "Climb the Highest Mountain," Mark Prophet, "Watch Your Dreams" and "The Third Music," Ann Ree Colton, and "The Reincarnation of Edgar Cayce?", Free and Wilcock, http://www.divinecosmos.com
cordially,
j.
2007-11-29 21:09:21 · answer #2 · answered by j153e 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
More frightening, then the state of our world is in now!
2007-11-29 21:13:03 · answer #3 · answered by jenny 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
it would create absolute war.
2007-11-29 20:55:02 · answer #4 · answered by The Nihilist 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋