McCain got his facts wrong about Paul being an isolationist. Paul has always been a non-interventionist. Why does everything end up with labeling? Thanks!
2007-11-29 14:53:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
This is how I rank them which are different after a day of consideration.
1. Mike Huckabee - witty, well-prepared, and compassionate and would unite us! He is the man for the job! Death penalty skate, but I understand why!
2. Mitt Romney - bickering with Rudy made him look petty; comments on torture made him seem wise and made McCain seem cold and on the attack! Comments on Confederate flag non-issue.
3. John McCain - affirmed that he is the well respected veteran and would lead well.
4. Fred Thompson - not heard from very much, seemed poorly prepared and confused. Not very articulate and disappointing. Sounded like he was trying out for VEEP.
5. Duncan Hunter – Faired well, not much time, but all answers were good! He would be a great VEEP to Huckabee!
6. Tom Tancredo – Good on one issue: Immigration, but he ranks high on my candidate calculator, so candidate for VEEP too!
7. Ron Paul - didn't respond well to McCain's attacks; rant about North American Union conspiracy made him seem too extreme.
8. Rudy Giuliani - bickering with Romney made him look petty, if I have to listen to his stats about NY one more time, I will PUKE!
VOTE TO KEEP AMERICA SAFE!
2007-11-30 15:24:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
mccain stated that the worlds indifference to hitler is what caused WWII -and the league of nations did nothing when he attacked poland (which is true )- the first time we attacked Iraq it was because they had taken kuwait as their own - this was against the worlds and our best interest and the worlds for that matter ( although we were the lead army with the world supporting us by sending troops and aid to clean up after wards ) -the second time was much different it stated saddam was aiding terrorists -building weapons of mass destruction etc much of which was proven false after the fact(many countries did not agree with our assessment of saddam and Iraq and we did not go to Iraq with Intl support -we pushed a fine line with UN approval to use force to irradicate any weapons of mass destruction to takeover a country)-So mccains attitude is basically if we distrust someone that gives us a right to take them out of power from their country because what if - where as ron paul is not a pacifist but will look at all facts (and make a responsible decision based on facts) and then go to congress for a declaration of war(or they will come to him with it) not this authorization to use force baloney which seems to be the "undercover" term for going to war today -
2007-11-30 06:02:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by rooster 5
·
0⤊
4⤋
McCain is just nuts and/or certifiable.
1. Does anyone really believe that the majority of Americans really want illegal alien sh-amnesty that he pushed so hard for?
2. Envoking the name of Hitler? Correct me if i'm wrong (i'm not) but didn't Dubya's grandfathers commit treason by financing Hitler before and during WWII? How about not funding nutjobs like Hitler? How about not funding nutjobs like Noriega, Osama & Saddam (all CIA)? I almost want to be an isolationist from my own government!
2007-11-29 21:26:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
Since you didn't say how McCain invoked Hitler or in what reference Hitler's name was used, no one can rationally answer this question. I believe you are merely trying to see how vile an attack on McCain you can get in response to this "question" so you can gloat over seeing the rantings of someone who is as hate filled as you are.
2007-11-29 23:13:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
5⤋
Well, McCain worked with Kennedy and Hillary to do that immigration thing against the "Vast" number of the American People's wishes.
If you lie down with dogs you get flees.
McCain's new campaign slogan; "An Army of One."
He's been in office for way too long!
He just doesn't *LISTEN* to The People anymore.
2007-11-29 21:19:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by tom p 3
·
4⤊
4⤋
**** Arizona for putting this nonsense McCain in office.
2007-11-30 10:41:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jerry H 5
·
0⤊
4⤋
He shot himself in the foot by support illegal immigration. He probably would have won the presidency if he did try to get amnesty passed
2007-11-29 20:39:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
5⤋
Basically. He wants to make an impact, no matter what he has to do, in order to win.
2007-11-29 20:41:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by spartan-117 3
·
3⤊
4⤋
Why in the world is that desperate? Hitler is history. We should learn from history and hopefully our leaders use history to make decisions.
Libs have been calling an American president Hitler for 7 years. Now that's desperate.
Iranian President Ahmadinejad:
"Are Jews human beings?"
Germany Fuehrer Hitler:
"Even when we have driven the Jew out of Germany, he remains our world enemy."
2007-11-29 20:40:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by pgb 4
·
0⤊
10⤋