Clintons turn again? That would be "fair and balanced" right?
2007-11-29 11:23:29 · 19 answers · asked by David M 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Well, Clinton would preserve the symmetry. And there's a certain nostaglia for the days of Peace, Prosperity, Budget Surpluses and People mattering.
But maybe it's time for something totally different. Anyway, the Religious Right doesn't believe in symmetry. Otherwise, after two Popes named John Paul, the current Pope would be George Ringo, instead of a guy who still has fond memories of his days in the Hitler Youth.
2007-11-29 14:56:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Fair and balanced is a moot point. Fox News made it moot. I rather see another Democrat besides Hillary Clinton. But I will take another Clinton over a Republican without a doubt.
2007-11-29 19:30:09 · answer #2 · answered by kenny J 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Nothing fair or balanced about Clinton. That's like saying CNN is fair and balanced...now that's funny.
2007-11-29 19:27:30 · answer #3 · answered by John in AZ 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, I was born in 1991...so in my life it would be Bush, Clinton, Bush.... it would be cool if it was clinton, you know, to keep it going. Too bad I dont agree with Clintons views. =/
But still, it would have been cool.
Interesting post, btw. Ive been thinking about that for awhile.
2007-11-29 19:26:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton
2007-11-29 19:30:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Bush - Clinton - Bush - Romney or Huckabee or Guliani or Thompson or Mcain
Has a nice ring to it.
2007-11-29 19:28:18 · answer #6 · answered by Dash 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
lol, that would almost be like an elected monarchy, but instead of passing through one family, it go back and forth between two families.It makes you wonder,though, if Hillary becomes the next president, then which member of the Bush family would be President after her?
2007-11-29 19:38:13 · answer #7 · answered by Dr. Ray Langston 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, it's the capabililty that matters. I'm not opposed to voting for another Clinton... as long as she does what she promises to do.
2007-11-29 19:28:54 · answer #8 · answered by Elvenarrow 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the first Clinton sucks both bush's rocked Hilary Clinton has very bad ideas and bad views on so many things if she wins i will move to England
2007-11-29 19:35:25 · answer #9 · answered by lexie d 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I think we should say the heck with it, write in Tommy Chong. At least he'll be honest, and admit to inhaling.
2007-11-29 19:34:40 · answer #10 · answered by rlstaehle 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋