http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/197/
"Hillary’s baby bond proposal would give $5,000 to each of the 4-million babies born in the U.S. each year, totaling $20-billion per year, multiplied by four years = $80-billion."
Republican National Committee on Monday, November 26th, 2007 in a Web site.
Truth-O-Meter rated RNC attack as False.
IF RNC can't correctly attack her than how are any of the other Republicans going to? Isn't RNC supposed to be GOP central for Bash Hillary intelligence.
2007-11-29 10:56:33 · 13 answers · asked by Michael M 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Beachbum
Nice to see you on board. I do not believe I have seen you answer one of my questions before, but nice to see you chimed in.
2007-11-30 02:17:06 · update #1
Lettie.
Your reply about menopause really cracks me up.
The day after election I will call RNC and laugh myself silly at them after Hillary wins. Just kidding ,that sort of thing is beneath me to do, but I can still think it though.
2007-11-30 02:23:29 · update #2
The RNC doesn't care and I would be willing to bet they got it wrong on purpose. Why? Because they know 99% of Republicans do not base any of their arguments on fact.
IE) Calling Hillary a socialist... the woman is a hardcore capitalist that was on the board of Wal-Mart 6 years.
The pt is they know R party members rarely look or research facts and half of them will believe junkola facts no matter what anyone says.
2007-11-29 11:01:42 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Since when has the truth mattered to the RNC? Republicans attacked a decorated veteran's service record, while electing a former guardsman who never flew a combat mission and was AWOL for his last year of duty and a running mate that was a draft dodger. They started a hoax about a candidate saying he invented the Internet and they're still repeating it as truth. Do you think that these ignoramuses check out polifact.com when they hear that Hillary's a socialist or Obama's a Muslim? They'll believe a chain e mail that suggests a guy who can't even keep a bj a secret had a bunch of people offed.
2007-11-29 11:10:08 · answer #2 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Some Republicans are still saying that U.S. troops found WMDs in Iraq. Truth has never mattered to Republicans. They learned from the Nazis that the bigger the lie, the more people will believe it.
If Hillary (and Bill) sued every Republican mouth-breather than lied about them, they would be the richest couple in the world.
2007-11-30 16:47:45 · answer #3 · answered by damnyankeega 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, Karl Rove's gone, but the stench still lingers in the White House. Now the Republican Party has to think up their own lies. They have to attack Hilary, you know, because none of the Candidates dare mention Bush. That would drag them right down to his level.
We see the Pillory Hilary Gang right here on Answers! They actually act as though she has ever done something worth the tongue-lashing she is getting. It is fear! Pure, unadulterated, yellow-bellied, shivering, quivering fear! They know this woman will end up in the White House, leaving the Mitts and the Huckabees in the dust behind her, tears of lost dreams in their rather-bleary, middle-aged eyes.
Good, ain't I? There's more.
Can you imagine the Republican Far Right on the night of Hilary's election. What sour grapes! What a bitter sting of defeat! They spent 70 million or more of our tax money rooting like wart hogs through every aspect of her life, every aspect of her husband's life, went through that nasty Impeachment, with their Blue Dress Flag waving high, acting as though a Republican never cheated on his wife, never sinned, never erred, oh no! Now, after five or six years of indictments and corruption, Hilary will take that Presidential Oath.
I can't think of a sweeter revenge!
2007-11-29 12:46:02 · answer #4 · answered by Me, Too 6 · 6⤊ 0⤋
simply by fact in politics there's a venture of equivalent air circumstances. If one celebration provides a speech, the different celebration is permitted air time for rebuttal. What that's, is an end run around that rule of regulation. unfastened air time of a number of hours for a precise call candidate. that's quite some unfastened face publicity for her. they have a proper to be disillusioned. If it grow to be some "valid" documentary it may be distinctive. yet, be honest, it can't be. and that they could hit proper till now the subsequent election?
2016-10-18 09:02:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
At this desperate point in time, the RNC is willing to attack her on a menopause issue. If they weren't afraid of her, they wouldn't bother to attack her at all.
2007-11-30 01:29:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's really a shame when anyone can just slander & lie about any politician without repercussion. The worst part is that even when it's proven to be false, they only believe, remember & spread the lie.
2007-11-30 05:45:50 · answer #7 · answered by mstrywmn 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its a stupid world with this many conservative voters in the population. They screw up the last 2 elections and will continue to screw up, including screw themselves.
2007-11-29 14:27:14 · answer #8 · answered by Tia T 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
You are assuming the RNC cares about the truth, or for that matter what is best for the country. Watch out for more swiftboat attacks!!!
2007-11-29 11:20:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
From the RNC's vantage point, this lie is a success since many people will read it, but few will read politifact.com's refutation.
Tell enough lies often enough and many will stick. Hmmmm, am I mixing metaphors? lol
2007-11-29 11:04:44 · answer #10 · answered by CaesarLives 5 · 6⤊ 1⤋