What would be a legally defensible definition of "family" for inclusion into a zoning ordinance? (see more)

Question

Historically, zoning ordinances have defined "family" as persons living together as a single housekeeping unit, who are also related by blook or marriage.

Seems to me that this is a discriminatory definition which can be used to keep gay, lesbian and transgendered couples out of certain neighborhoods, OR even two people that decide to live together, whether for romantic purposes, or simply to share expenses (roomates).

I think some of those historical definitions of family are being struck down, but what are they being replaced with? Can someone point me to a good, non-discriminatory definition of "family?"

Thank you!

For all the bigots and homophobes out there, PLEASE choose another question to spew your hate. Thanks.

SORRY! "Blook" s/b "Blood."

I'm writing a zoning ordinance for a client, a municipal government, and need to know. I've known governments that used their definition of family to keep households with more than 3 unrelated people from living in a single-family neighborhood.

Answer 1

You may be firing at the wrong target. From what I have seen of municipal or county zoning, family has little to do with the regulations.

On the other hand, conodminium or residential housing association rules may have family issues. Particularly, the "adult" communities, which forbid people from residing who are under 55. What would happen if a couple over 55 has a grandchild and needs to beome the child's guardian? Do they have to move?