a)
x 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20
f(x) 2, 6, 9, 10.5, 12.5, 14 (with variation)
delta x = 20/5= 4
Lower sum 4[2+ 6+ 9+ 10.5+ 12.5]= 160
Upper sum 4[6+ 9+ 10.5+ 12.5+ 14]= 208
b)
x 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20
f(x) 2, 4.5, 6, 7.5, 9, 9.5, 10.5, 11.5, 12.5, 13, 14 (with variation)
delta x = 20/10= 2
Lower sum 2[2+ 4.5+ 6+ 7.5+ 9+ 9.5+ 10.5+ 11.5+ 12.5+ 13]= 172
Upper sum 2[ 4.5+ 6+ 7.5+ 9+ 9.5+ 10.5+ 11.5+ 12.5+ 13+ 14]= 196
c) Integrate (estimate area) velocity for distance
t(s) 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
v(ft/s) 0 6.7 10.8 15.5 18.8 19.4 20
delta x = 3/6 =1/2
Lower sum 1/2[0+ 6.7+ 10.8+ 15.5+ 18.8+ 19.4]= 35.6
Upper sum 1/2[ 6.7+ 10.8+ 15.5+ 18.8+ 19.4+ 20]= 45.6
2007-11-30 09:52:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by SOmath4 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
For the 5 rectangles from x = 0 to x = 20, split the domain into 5 equal pieces: [0,4], [4,8], ...[16,20] (Since the diagram is only 12 squares wide, it looks like each interval should be 2 squares wide.)
Each of these has width 4 and a height which varies from one end of the interval to the other. If you use the lowest height (in this case the one for the lower end of the interval) then you will get an underestimate of the true area of the vertical strip; if you use the highest height (the one for the higher end of the interval) you'll get an overestimate for the area of the rectangle. Either way, compute the area of each rectangle and sum to get the lower and upper estimates for the total area under the graph.
Next repeat the same procedure with 10 rectangles. Each will have a width of 2 instead of 4 (i.e. be one square wide instead of two). Since each interval is smaller, the difference between the height at the beginning and the height at the end of each interval will be smaller, so the two estimates will be closer together and more accurate than the estimates with only 5 rectangles.
For the runner problem, distance = speed X time. If you graph speed against time, the area is the distance. The procedure is the same except each interval should be half a second wide (and since you have the values, you don't actually have to look at a graph.)
2007-11-30 14:46:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by simplicitus 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow that's quite tricky, cuz such as you suggested, i does no longer go with to do away with anybody....yet in the tip...i think of i could shop my sister simply by fact she is youthful and could be waiting to stay longer than my mom and dad, so i could have somebody with me for an prolonged volume of time.
2016-10-18 08:56:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by ocain 4
·
0⤊
0⤋