Can everyone who bought Gores Movie about it sue him for misinformation?
2007-11-29 08:30:54 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
dkstrin no will put these people in jail for lying and leading up to WAR!
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 | Source
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 | Source
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the mi
2007-11-29 08:37:46 · update #1
No, because Gore's film was based on the scientific data. If the scientific data turns out to be wrong, that still doesn't make Gore's film misinformation.
However, it's impossible for the current warming to be due to a natural cycle. Scientists are well-aware of the Earth's natural cycles. You might as well ask 'if a day on Earth takes 22 hours and summer lasts 12 months, can everyone who bought Gore's movie sue him for misinformation'?
Besides which, you can't sue 'for misinformation'.
2007-11-30 04:51:30 · answer #1 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The real problem will be if we do nothing to solve global warming and it turns out not to have been a normal cycle.
2007-11-29 16:42:48 · answer #2 · answered by Mencken 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You must be Sean Hannitys little bro-the things the we do to prevent global warming will provide us with cleaner breathing air.........at the very least-and save on natural resources-even if you don't believe in mans adverse effect on our environment-by the way Sean would not debate me on his radio show......
2007-11-29 16:45:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
If you could sue a liberal for lying, there wouldn't be enough courts in the land to handle the litigation!
2007-11-29 17:40:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
If it turns out to not have been exacerbated by human activity, then just about every scientist in the relevant fields will have to retire. But since we already know that it is more than just a natural cycle, there's nothing to worry about, right?
2007-11-29 16:34:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
Does this mean the Ozone layer is fine?
2007-11-29 16:39:36 · answer #6 · answered by One eyed pirate 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That's pretty unlikely. It'll be 10,000-20,000 years before we can tell whether or not it's just natural cycle.
2007-11-29 16:38:21 · answer #7 · answered by Beardog 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
im not buying it since calif is to be underwater in 30 yrs!
2007-11-29 17:20:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If it turns out there there were no WMDs in Iraq...can George Bush but thrown into jail for starting war based on false pretenses?
1.9 trillion, almost 4,000 american troops and over 30,000 injuries.
Yeah...based on intelligence from the white house. If only somebody had talked to the CIA who said there were no WMDS. Oh wait...there was a guy....His name was Wilson....
2007-11-29 16:34:41 · answer #9 · answered by Franklin 7 · 2⤊ 6⤋
Liberals aren't sue-happy like you.
we don't live our lives in fear that someone else is getting something we're not.
we don't obsess over the money and property we think we deserve.
we like to enjoy our liberties and we somehow find joy in knowing that others have the same liberties instead of hating and resenting them for it.
2007-11-29 16:37:16 · answer #10 · answered by sam f 4 · 3⤊ 5⤋