Sublime would've been HUGE. I have to go with them due to the fact that their music was more diverse and had a wider range of possibilities.
2007-11-29 08:25:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dani G 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
Yeah i agree, I think short term Nirvana would acheive more success, but over the long run it would have to be Sublime just because people would get bored of listening to the same thing and with a Sublime album its like buying four completey differant albums
2007-11-29 08:28:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by StevieRayVaughan 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
I would say Sublime. Their music was not so stuck in one scene or genre like Nirvana. I also just like them alot more.
2007-11-29 09:07:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sour Girl 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Sublime. Eventually, people would've realized that all of Nirvana's songs sounded the same and stopped listening to them. Since Cobain died, though, all of their songs are automatically priceless classics in the eyes of a lot of people. Not me, obviously, but still.
2007-11-29 08:18:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sam K 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
definitely Nirvana
2007-11-29 11:28:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by mcr_raven [MCRmy TSN] 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nirvana
another band I think would be Alice In Chains. Even though they're back with a new singer. They would have gotten even greater (if possible).
2007-11-29 13:00:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by MonkeyMan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
nirvana for sure. im listening to them right now as i answer this. if kurt was still here they would still be going. his death also helped them though. i dont really like sublime that much either.
R.I.P. kurt cobain
2007-11-29 08:14:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by R.I.P. Cliff Burton 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
nirvana
2007-11-29 08:16:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by i love him but he doesnt realise 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
nirvana definitely
2007-11-29 08:12:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋