2007-11-29 07:37:49 · 30 answers · asked by ♂ Equibrilium ♀ 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
For now, no .. but, as medical technology advances, and a human's life span increases significantly .. it might be a good idea, as there will be more humans being born, than those who are dying. My grandmother lived to 106 years old, and it not that far away where the average human will live to the age of 150 years old. Your proposal isn't unrealistic, but rather a possible solution to over-population, but, it's not that bad ... YET. :)
2007-11-29 07:44:29 · answer #1 · answered by ♥Carol♥ 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Apparently you've never been to Eastern Oregon, Wyoming, Idaho, North Dakota, or Montana. There is plenty of space left, people just need to be less picky. Plus, wouldn't that kind of be a sure fire way to self destruct.
2007-11-29 15:42:07 · answer #2 · answered by KneeKnee 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
There is no over-population.
Study the current downfall of Europe.
Some countries are paying bonuses to have more kids.
Over-population is a myth.
2007-11-29 15:43:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Watch 'Children of Men' and then tell me if that's a good policy
2007-11-29 15:41:05 · answer #4 · answered by mexikostadt 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I agree with one of the other guys, I think we should stop the stupid ones from breeding first. That would also probably stop the multiple offenders at the same time.
2007-11-29 15:46:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
"global regulations will be imposed and a world governing body will be formed"
might be better to have people fixed at birth... then they would have to apply for a breading license to be unfixed for awhile.. so they could try and have kids
is not really such a problem in developed countries anyways
2007-11-29 15:43:43 · answer #6 · answered by grey_worms 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, Think of the world as a fish tank go on think about it. Over crowd a fish tank and the fish start to die.Stop and think.
2007-11-29 16:09:13 · answer #7 · answered by Jason T 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Only if you could relocate some people from the over crowded places to the less crowded places. It won't work if it isn't evenly distributed.
2007-11-29 15:40:53 · answer #8 · answered by sandwest 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I don't think so. I think the rising cost of living is enough to stop anyone from having a lot of children.
2007-11-29 15:41:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
no we are doing a project in school and your either for it or against it I am against it becuz its just wrong
people should be able to have as many child as they want if they can take care of it
2007-11-29 15:46:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋