No I won't vote for Senator Obama because so much of what he advocates conflicts with his actual voting record. He spoke out against the Patriot Act then voted in favor of reauthorizing it, he cannot commit to withdrawing the troops out of Iraq by 2013, possibly later.. He hasn't ruled out using strikes against Iran, not to mention the same vote he criticizes Hillary for, he missed himself and sponsored the exact same legislation designating the IRG a terrorist organization in back in April.. He implied that he would invade Pakistan, without the consent of their government.. He made votes making it more difficult for average citizens to sue big corporations.. He has no consistency on the issues of social security and taxes, in the very beginning he was for raising the cap, then having all options on the table, then appointing a bipartisan commission, now he's back to raising the cap.. He receives contributions from lobbyists, corporations and interest groups, despite his denials.. He promises "change" but he has neither the substance, the experience, nor desire to deliver this change..
I'm looking for someone who will truly end the war in Iraq and not start another one with Iran.. my candidate is Ron Paul
2007-11-29 08:39:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I am not voting for Obama because all he has done since being elected Illinois senator is run for president and fight with Hillary. He's got no experience with national or international politics. Obama could have made more of an impact as a senator. If he had waited to run until 2012, I would have considered voting for him.
Hillary is crazy. Edwards is a whiney little douche and I keep forgetting that he's still a candidate.
I'm still voting for Richardson.
2007-11-29 08:02:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by badkitty1969 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
i'm vote casting for Obama because of the fact he's the extra advantageous canidate. neither is proper yet between the two Obama is 100x extra advantageous. Romney additionally needs to do away with financial help (over ninety% of yankee scholars use financial help) If he repeals Obamacare hundreds of thousands of folk (babies blanketed) would be without healthcare. Romney has fairly much the comparable regulations as bush. We gave republicans 8 years in place of work and what did they do??? MESS each little thing UP Obama have been given into place of work whilst our financial device turn into in unfastened fall. Republicans get mad because of the fact Obama did not thoroughly restoration Bushs 8 years of mess in only 4 short years. so as that they elect to re-% somebody with the comparable regulations because of the fact the guy who despatched our financial device into unfastened fall
2016-12-10 08:03:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If they do, they are idiots. Your name and what your father is and where he is from means diddly. The King of Jordan is named Abdullah Hussein, and he is a loyal friend to America (he went to my high school, for crying out loud!), so names ean nothing.
I would also like to see him win, because I like his message about being bipartisan, and that he is new blood and thus and such.
2007-11-29 07:20:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
Obama will be voted for the issues that he carries although his relation to being a Muslim and Black could either be good or bad for his candidacy.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will likely win.
2007-11-29 07:25:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
The only way I would vote for him is if Ron Paul is not nominated by the Republican party and he is the Democratic Nominee. I will not vote for a continuation of war, whatsoever. Even if it means I have to go against my wishes against socialism.
2007-11-29 07:23:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
I would not vote for Obama because I don't believe he is qualified to be the leader of the free world. By the way, nice jab at Hillary.
2007-11-29 07:13:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
5⤋
Some people may have reservations because of that, not me. I won't vote for him because I don't think he is ready for the job.
2007-11-29 07:14:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by booman17 7
·
5⤊
2⤋
Some people might, but I wouldn't vote for him because he's liberal bastard.
2007-11-29 07:18:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
no - they won't vote for him because he's inexperienced, pro-amnesty and a socialist!
2007-11-29 07:22:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋