English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2) Lying to the people of the U.S., to Congress, and to the U.N., providing false and deceptive rationales for war.

2007-11-29 06:43:12 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

3 answers

Yes without a shadow of a doubt.
While certain aspects of UN Security Council Resolution 1441 are remarkably vague, two things are clear. First, Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein must accomplish a sequence of tasks over the next few months or almost certainly face serious consequences, most likely a US-led invasion. Second, in the event of non-compliance the United States is not automatically authorized to take unilateral military action to effect regime change in Iraq, certainly not before another meeting of the Security Council
http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forum/forumnew73.php
The United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan has told the BBC the US-led invasion of Iraq was an illegal act that contravened the UN charter.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=nl&safe=off&rls=SUNA,SUNA:2007-14,SUNA:en&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=Annan+war+illegal&spell=1
UN & Nuremberg Charters are part of "the supreme Law of the Land"
Article VI of the US Constitution states that:
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land;"

2007-11-29 07:20:29 · answer #1 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 0 0

Your provider as a foot soldier, mutually as admirable, grants no particular declare to information the geopolitics that is going on on the point of worldwide management. And that's sparkling that it does not supply you lots perception into what Marxism is. Obama and the NATO allies have made no such dedication to countless conflict anymore than replace into finished whilst air-ability replace into used to subdue Serbians in 1998. As to the political persuasion of people who would be interior the front strains of air strikes and enforcement of the UN determination, i'm fairly confident that there will be liberals, conservatives and consistent with risk even - sturdy gravy! - a Marxist or 2. braveness isn't correlated with regardless of if one hangs on the words of folk like Limbaugh or, for that count, Maher.

2016-10-09 22:28:39 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Absolutely! *sm*

2007-11-29 07:11:53 · answer #3 · answered by LadyZania 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers