Those who are aware how communists and socialists operate, know they have to create distrust, to fool people, to support them. No one would choose a socialist or communist society if it was presented honestly without bias.
Can you imagine telling people to turn in their posessions and freedom to government and hope this new governement will be free of corruption, will provide you a better life (without freedom) and won't execute you (Papa Stalin).
N0, they need minions like Michael Moore to create distrust, carefully targeting the fabric of capitalistic society-
Faith- intolerance of Christianity, portraying all Christians as nut-job fundamentalists
Marriage- trivilializing marriage, supporting gay marriage and "shallow" marriages
Family- look at minorities, exploited by liberals, now have more single parent families than ever
Patriotism- recall how liberals acted like vampires in daylight when the country briefly pulled together after 911?
Capitalism- demonizing it
2007-11-29 06:34:10 · 14 answers · asked by ? 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Mylilbubbers- cut down on the Kool-Aid; there is nothing genuine about Moore, he is a shrewd manipulator and is not honest enough to disclose his true intentions.
Moore had the opportunity to target trial lawyers in "Sicko" but gave them a pass; tort reform is the BIGGEST need in health care but Moore won't target a fellow minion of the socialist movement.
2007-11-29 07:13:38 · update #1
He is a Liberal, so my guess would be the next Republican candidate.
Not to worry, if he can't find anything wrong, he WILL make something up!
.
2007-11-29 06:56:35 · answer #1 · answered by Moody Red 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Why could we could consistently spend lots money on well-being care? enormously whilst over 50% of the U. S. paintings tension lives on minimum salary and might't arise with the money for well-being care? whilst human beings get state assistance, they are limited to what well-being care they acquire, and a brilliant variety of of those human beings make extra suitable than poverty so as that they are in a position to't get that state scientific assistance interior the 1st place. My father has had a coronary heart assault, and the medicine he has to take to stay alive is in excess of $one thousand consistent with month. he's 40 4 and assuming he lives to be 70, he might have spent 312,000 income prescriptions, not to show the $189,000 for his lifestyles saving surgical operation. it incredibly is $500,000 for one coronary heart assault sufferer, multiply that by using the 1000's of folk consistent with twelve months that have coronary heart assaults, it no ask your self why the scientific occupation is a multi billion dollar a twelve months marketplace.
2016-10-09 22:28:19 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He's so far out there, I don't know if I even want to venture a guess...but here goes...the next Republican President, is who he'll target.
He should try to find the troll hiding under his gut, but I suppose he's waiting for universal health care to cover the cost of that extensive project. Maybe he'll get one of his lib buddies to work it into a bill as pork spending!?!
2007-11-29 07:42:14 · answer #3 · answered by Sparxfly 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Michael Moore has extremely compelling points and is very good at showing one side of the story. His compassion is innocent, yet ignorant in my opinion. He has truly good intentions I believe, as do most people. However, it is hard to argue with someone saying money would be better spent providing universal healthcare and such rather than on a war. However, governmental mandates for private insurance and healthcare through taxation are not the solutions to our answers. Most people (including myself - a staunch Republican that disagrees with everything that has happened in the past 7 years) would find it hard to argue if they disagree with war, that money would be better spent on other things if it is going to be forcifully taken and spent anyway. See, you are the exact same as Michael Moore in my opinion, unti lyou can change that - you will polarize people and offend people the same way. Present ideas for correcting problems and show people why Michael Moores ideas are doomed for failure, don't name call - that will only hurt your cause.
2007-11-29 06:51:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Freedom or Capitalism probably.
2007-11-29 06:37:58 · answer #5 · answered by Bob J 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Lear Jet Liberals? Oh yeah....he is one.
2007-11-29 11:06:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It probably won't be the fast food industry.
2007-11-29 08:05:02 · answer #7 · answered by badkitty1969 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In our own homes next i bet
2007-11-29 08:36:02 · answer #8 · answered by Kurt 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
200 cheeseburgers.
2007-11-29 06:40:22 · answer #9 · answered by Scrappy52 6 · 6⤊ 0⤋
He's probably done.
I know he attacks food everyday.
2007-11-29 07:56:46 · answer #10 · answered by idontknow 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋