English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

I see very few people that want Hillary in office. She can fool part of the people part of the time but not all of the people all of the time. She is already known as a person that panders to whatever audience she is in front of. She should take her 80 million and give to the poor people she has fooled into thinking she worries about them!

2007-11-29 06:33:13 · answer #1 · answered by question212 6 · 1 0

The other problem is that whoever gets elected next will probably look bad no matter what they do because Bush has made a mess of things that is going to take a long time to recover from, even if the leader is good.

This is also the problem with Obama being the first non-white president. But hey, all we can do is hope that the first woman or African American elected show the American people how ridiculous it is that we've taken so long to elect anyone who isn't a white man. I don't know if Hillary is the right one for the job, but maybe I'll be pleasantly surprised.

2007-11-29 06:40:32 · answer #2 · answered by Sarah 5 · 0 0

I'll bet it would be faster than you'd think. Nothing would motivate women across the country like a poor performance from the first woman President. They'd be running in droves in every election, just to prove that they're not all as bad as Hillary.

2007-11-29 06:33:21 · answer #3 · answered by Beardog 7 · 0 0

Simple. There's greater chance of more women running for president if they just step up and run. Women, in general stay away from politics for some reason. Nancy Pelosi had a chance, the power, the votes. EXCEPT, her malarky about tax cuts, and cutting funds never did anything for her leadership. Granted if she DID pass legistation to stop funds and the war, she could've used that as a platform to run for president. Also, the corporate/political power structure is run by men so that's a factor.

2007-11-29 06:40:19 · answer #4 · answered by jgtorres85 2 · 0 0

Hillary's lack of male anatomy will have very little if anything to do with why she will be a awful President (should such a nightmare befall us).

Will people blame her lack of male anatomy as the problem? I doubt it, but I am sure she will.

2007-11-29 06:43:23 · answer #5 · answered by Calvin 7 · 0 0

trust me on this one: Hillary will be the greatest President, ever.
A great history is in the making. She has high caliber, is intelligent, approachable and most of all, wise. She can almost take on all the Big Boys. She cant fail.

2007-11-29 06:37:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I think people are wise enough to conclude that if Hillary turns out to be an awful President, which is not much of a stretch, it will not be because of her gender.

2007-11-29 06:29:10 · answer #7 · answered by Pythagoras 7 · 4 1

Her presidency will have no bearing on any future woman canidate. Jimmy Carter's failings did not stop another white, male, southern governor from becoming president.

2007-11-29 06:33:29 · answer #8 · answered by Shadow Knight 7 · 0 0

2016---I believe Senator Clinton will be a monumental President, how about Nancy Pelosi next.

2007-11-29 06:36:00 · answer #9 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 0 1

dont know...pretty sure hillary will get it huh i believe society would allow a woman over a black man though its sad to see it that way but alot of people feel it . i myself are not pleased with any canidates . they dont say any thing to better anything

2007-11-29 08:43:25 · answer #10 · answered by b.johne k 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers