2007-11-29 05:53:56 · 12 answers · asked by funkeemonkee136 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Con: It's unfair.
Pro: It's the only thing that really works.
2007-11-29 05:56:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋
Get rich quick schemes in the capitalist business world, (buyouts, IPOs, conglomerates, acquisitions, mergers, and the stock market), do not actually work. Remaining solvent does not actually exist within false economics capitalism.
Profit existing in the capitalist business world, or millionaires existing within capitalism, is pathological deception committed by the 21 organizations spying on the population with plain clothes agents, (with covert fake names and fake backgrounds).
Actual economics is the persons paying the monthly business loan payments of companies voting at work in order to control the property they are paying for.
Capitalism is the psychology of imaginary parents, false economics, and the criminal deception of employees that are paying the bills (including the stocks and bonds, or shares) of companies.
Anti-democracy republicanism is the psychology of imaginary parents, and false government.
2007-12-01 04:41:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
first poster is pretty good.... short sweet and true...
Pro: Opportunities for all, the skies the limit !
Con: A few are able to fly disproportionately higher than most, by standing on the backs of those closer to the ground.
2007-11-29 05:58:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
The problem may be that as opposed to rewarding the best in society it rewards that which makes the most money. By this i mean that which appeals to the most people and saves/makes money immediately but might not be great in the long run (ie. dumping chemical waste, making useless plastic trinkets, moving jobs out of the country to communist China etc.).
It might be bad for socialists or commies but parts of it are also bad for people who want any sort of sustainable future (ie. real Conservatives) and doesnt want things that just appeal to the lowest common denominator.
2007-11-29 06:08:27 · answer #4 · answered by Mark R 1 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The biggest "pro" is also the biggest "con"
You are in charge of your own life and well-being.
2007-11-29 05:58:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Pro's - If you were rich when you entered the world, you will more than likely continue being rich beyond the next 40 years.
Con's - Britney Spears
2007-11-29 05:58:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Pros And Cons Of Capitalism
2017-02-28 05:01:40 · answer #7 · answered by takako 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
cons: it's not terribly fair, and it screws people who are unlucky
pros: it rewards hard work, ingenuity, resourcefulness. oh and it's the only modern economic system that is consistantly successful
2007-11-29 05:59:07 · answer #8 · answered by f0876and1_2 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Capitalism - It provides competition. Competition leads to bigger and better products and technologies that make life easier and more manageable. Best of all, the market is decided by the consumer.
It makes people rich. Rich people try to do better. Rich people provide all the jobs.
Con - It's only bad if you are a socialist or communist
2007-11-29 06:01:14 · answer #9 · answered by Fred Head 4 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Pro:
Encourages competition, growth and rewards those who do well, is based on the premise of wealth and privilege.
Con:
Holds people accountable for their life's decisions, doesn't really offer a safety net for those whose parents did not teach them how to succeed.
2007-11-29 06:04:15 · answer #10 · answered by Doc 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋