With regards to the two recent debates they hosted. The Dem debate had "undecided voters" asking questions. Several of those undecided voters were quickly ferreted out as Democrat activists.
Now in the Youtube GOP Debate, it's quickly becoming obvious that many askers were Democrat activists again.
http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/29/digging-out-the-cnnyoutube-plants-abortion-questioner-is-edwards-supporter/
2007-11-29 03:31:41 · 16 answers · asked by Uncle Pennybags 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
More links from less biased sources:
http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2007/11/29/hillary-plants-question-at-gop-debate/
http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/shared-blogs/ajc/politicalinsider/entries/2007/11/29/whoops_the_general_who_asked_t.html
2007-11-29 03:38:27 · update #1
Why are you libs bringing up FOX News? You don't like them because they are biased, but you defend CNN because it's biased?
2007-11-29 03:39:35 · update #2
It's all right. The Republicans are getting a lot of practice answering actual questions while Democrats are answering "do you prefer diamonds or pearls."
Wait until the general election when the Democrat candidate looks like the clueless person they are. (It doesn't matter who, they all are)
2007-11-29 03:37:34 · answer #1 · answered by Philip McCrevice 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It's becoming crazy. There is a fight going on in this country and it will have an effect on our country for the foreseeable future. Fox was the response to liberal media. The good thing here is that more people are getting involved. Now we need some type of regulation, an open, honest debate and bring out in the open those who hide their identity. Who needs to be dishonest and why?
2007-11-29 03:51:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Being biased is completely naturally. Even this question is biased in infering that CNN is being biased. An unbiased question would say: What is your opinion of CNN? People at CNN vote too, and our naturally tendencies are to tell people our opinions as fact (or stretch rules for people we agree with). The fact is that those who are compeled to be part of an activist group would also be drawn to submit a question to a presidential candidate if the opprotunity presented itself. Unbiased media will exist one day, when robots report the news...but humans who are biased will program the robots...
2007-11-29 04:28:13 · answer #3 · answered by Aaron W 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It is so blatant how CNN and other mainstream media entitys are being biased. They are blatantly shutting Ron Paul out of the mainstream regardless of what the American people are saying.
CNN's bias is a very good example of how much influence big business has on our "free press". We are no longer free to choose our president because we are not given a fair choice or fair information to go with it.
This country is going down the tubes and we are just sitting here and letting big business and big government crap on our first amendment rights.
Vote Ron Paul!
He is our only hope
2007-11-29 03:49:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Da, CNN means Clinton News Network.
2007-11-29 03:39:54 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
What does it matter who asks the questions? And when the democrats participated in the youtube debate do you think there were no republicans asking questions? What about the guy with his "baby"? Do you seriously think that guy would vote for any democratic candidate?
The questions are serious (even if the format is not) and are representative of what Americans are thinkign and asking themselves.
2007-11-29 03:55:21 · answer #6 · answered by labken1817 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
everybody has the unfairness of their very own perceptions. Clinton's supporters think of she is dealt with unfairly by way of the media simply by fact she gets asked debate questions first. Obama's supporters think of he's dealt with unfairly by way of the media simply by fact human beings handle his comments with reference to the monetary gadget, weapons and god as a extensive tale. McCain supporters think of the media treats him unfairly simply by fact the NYTimes runs a tale approximately him having a achievable affair with a lobbyist. in case you're a flesh presser the media is like dying: it may be on your side for a on an identical time as, yet faster or later it gets you.
2016-10-18 08:37:38 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, they continuously sacrifice their integrity in order to promote their political agendas.
Hillary? I don't know how she can ever hold her head up after all her most obvious faux pas over the last several weeks. She's a snake....
2007-11-29 20:04:31 · answer #8 · answered by wider scope 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
How can you tell the Clinton News Network is Biased?Liberals can't be biased because they are liberal
2007-11-29 03:51:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Michelle Malkin may be the most biased person on the planet. She's a Republican party whore and hardly a credible source of information
2007-11-29 03:35:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋