English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

mean really watched? I thought he had a nervous twitch or something like that. The way he jerks and moves his hands! If you watch and listen he is sending hand signals to his supporters to cheer boo etc. like a conductor in an orchestra! do you think it makes him look like a puppet master ?

2007-11-29 03:22:43 · 16 answers · asked by Dr.NO 3 in Politics & Government Elections

Look,@ no more ron pual spam

2007-11-29 03:35:21 · update #1

16 answers

I did not notice this, but I did think that both he and McCain needed to drink more water, which all candidates did have at the podium. They both had white spots on the corners of their mouths and it wasn't like they did a lot of talking....

What we call debates are far from anything resembling a real debate. If we could actually see the candidates debate each other that would be awesome. Until the, we have to do our own research. Use these sites to learn more about the issues, and the candidates.

http://www.vajoe.com/candidate_calculator.html
http://www.votesmart.org/
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21116732
http://www.answers.com/topic/united-states-presidential-election-2008?cat=tec...
http://www.declareyourself.com/?gclid=CO7IkrDO3Y8CFQHHIgodCz5P0w

Here is how I ranked the last debate and the candidates. I will vote for the Republican Nominee! Mike Huckabee or Mitt Romney are my 1st and 2nd choice...so to be honest, my filter may not be objective!

1. Mike Huckabee - witty, well-prepared, and compassionate and would unite us! He is the man for the job! Death penalty skate, but I understand why!
2. Mitt Romney - bickering with Rudy made him look petty; comments on torture made him seem wise and made McCain seem cold and on the attack! Comments on Confederate flag non-issue.
3. John McCain - affirmed that he is the well respected veteran and would lead well.
4. Fred Thompson - not heard from very much, seemed poorly prepared and confused. Not very articulate and disappointing. Sounded like he was trying out for VEEP.
5. Duncan Hunter – Faired well, not much time, but all answers were good! He would be a great VEEP to Huckabee!
6. Tom Tancredo – Good on one issue: Immigration, but he ranks high on my candidate calculator, so candidate for VEEP too!
7. Ron Paul - didn't respond well to McCain's attacks; rant about North American Union conspiracy made him seem too extreme.
8. Rudy Giuliani - bickering with Romney made him look petty, if I have to listen to his stats about NY one more time, I will PUKE!

VOTE TO KEEP AMERICA SAFE!

2007-11-30 08:11:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

no longer some thing is inaccurate with Ron Paul. probable, the way that you spot his responses as stupid, loopy and basically common clueless is with the aid of your perceptions. we've for such an excellent style of years been propagandized to have self belief that issues ought to paintings a particular way, or a candiate ought to behave a particular way and say particular issues that look usual. yet, even as someone does no longer furnish you with you what appears to be like the norm, it comes for the era of as no longer particularly properly. the concept applicants who do no longer promise to do all kinds of significant tings to revive our issues as no longer particularly sane is with the aid of the actual undeniable actuality that "those who govern least govern fantastic" because they do no longer make delivers that can not be kept. anybody who does such isn't trustworthy with the voters contained in the first position and by ability of extension will maximum likley no longer be trustworthy with the ruled to whom they make suggested delivers. what number delivers by ability of authorities were kept? what number circumstances have we discoverd we were no longer given the data? the concept we are all persons and that goverment isn't the answer to ALL issues is evidenced with each tragedy. authorities basically does no longer paintings contained in the pastime of the ruled. That fact is apparent honestly. it would want to be helpfull to envision better heritage so as that the objecive fact is what we base our judgements upon. heritage repeates itself and proganda tries to body the "fact" for you. 2 alternatives modern-day themselves. One, To belive what you're instructed to have self belief or to seek for fact utilizing the objective data.

2016-10-25 04:48:02 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yes, I really watch the body language of all the candidates and it seems Ron Paul and Huckabee are very sincere. Tancredo is totally discusted and the rest of them are seasoned politicians who are masters at deceit. I have to give those three a lot of credit especially Ron Paul because he has refused to join the good ole boys GOP for years. DId you know he is the only candidate who will not participate in the Congressional Pension Program? Imagine that. With all the raises those people constantly give themselves he could be set for life whether in or out of office. That along with so many other reasons it is obvious why he has become the GOP whipping boy. Yet, he is still hanging tough regardless of a nervous twitch.

2007-11-29 03:37:10 · answer #3 · answered by skycat 5 · 4 8

I condider myself a behavior specialist and he came off as very nervous. The man is a speech giver not a 30 second question answerer. Also dude is old he is in his seventies.

I can guarantee you that he is constantly berated and browbeaten by the rest of those cocky arrogant jackasses who were blah blah blahing us to death. At least he answered the questions he was asked.


Also he is an honest man and with the seriousness of the questions they were being asked how can you can expect anyone to answer them without BSing?

Vote Ron Paul 2008!
He is our only hope!

2007-11-29 03:36:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5 8

It's a vast right wing conspiracy! LOL!
1st choice Ron Paul
2nd choice Barack Obama

These two men represent change, Paul offering the most.
I hope to have the opportunity to vote for one of them!

He was by far the best in the debates, and the only Rep. I will vote for.

2007-11-29 03:33:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5 8

You think that was bad, you should see him in person. Even worse. Spaced out. Before the know nothing little Paulies go after me, DO YOU KNOW HIM? HAVE YOU EVER MET HIM?
I have, I have been to his office. Now you want to talk about an exercise in futility, getting an answer from Hillary would be easier.

2007-11-29 03:44:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 7

You have quite an imagination! He maybe gets a bit nervous but conductor, orchestra, puppet master???

2007-11-29 03:26:48 · answer #7 · answered by Ktcyan 5 · 6 8

Any positives he may hold are diminished or totally invalidated by his claim that we--America--deserved to be hit on 9/11.

"They (Al-Queda) attacked because our military was in Saudi Arabia."

2007-11-29 03:42:39 · answer #8 · answered by Liability Of The Left III 2 · 5 6

Sorry he's not a professional bs artist like the other candidates and he's sending signals to his supporters.. are you delusional?

2007-11-29 03:40:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 9

Oh he was a good looking guy!

2007-11-29 03:37:44 · answer #10 · answered by Buggy 3 · 7 4

fedest.com, questions and answers