If they show constant man vs women approval ratings during the debates, why don't they show by race?

Question

race is irrelivant... as irrelivant as man vs woman.

Answer 1

good question..we can have 12 lines going across..one for whites, blacks, hispanics, jews, indians,etc. and we can bet on which line gets the highest

Answer 2

I would venture a guess that there are ROUGHLY the same number of men and women in the country- a few more women but not a lot. On the other hand the difference between races in terms of percentage of the whole is much more significant. In other word, how things affect a large portion of women will have a larger impact in an election than how things affect a large portion of black for example. Plus there are only two genders but multiple races.
Anyone that doesnt believe there is diversity in the GOP is a kool aid drinking clown- just because far left fanatics tell you such things doesnt mean they are true.

Answer 3

I agree with Meowarf, these Demographics applied to approval ratings are only promoting bias. Perhaps the data reflects badly for a given minority's voting habits (like low turnout for a given race) and so it is omitted so as not to bias citizens whether to vote or not or for whom.

Answer 4

Not true. as a woman, i don't really ''act'' like a stereotypical woman

Answer 5

Because race doesn't apply the the media's sweetheart, Hillary. The media wants to make this sexist. It plays into Hillary's hands, but I personally think she is the most beatable. So let them be.

Answer 6

Men vs women things are not helpful as well as race vs. another race. They just promote prejudice/bias. We must learn to view people as humans above being a male or a female or a caucasian or what.

Answer 7

Double standards?

Answer 8

Because it's difficult to find diversity in the republican party other then men/women.

Answer 9

race is irrelevant

Answer 10

Were there any blacks in the audience?

Maybe that's why.