English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I feel like a vote for Billery will be a vote for government rule and a loss of freedoms. It is not the responsibility of the government to force people to do anything. I feel that Obama has the right idea. Make healthcare more affordable, don't force people have it. This is still America where we have the freedom of choice.
Under Billery's plan some people who chose not to have it in favor of paying cash for services would be forced to do something they don't want to.

2007-11-29 02:46:41 · 6 answers · asked by Hoptoad City 4 in Politics & Government Elections

6 answers

Without a way to enforce her heathcare insurance requirement such a idea is completely worthless.

A law that penalized people for not getting health insurance would likely be found to be unconstitutional anyways. One can require people to pay taxes on their income to work, or auto insurance to drive, but one cannot require people to purchase insurance in order to breath air (although if such were made law the insurance companies would certainly do everything in their power to try to have it enforced and kept the law of the land...cause they care so much about all of us after all).

Such a plan is only going to make insurance companies alot richer (and end up with the insurance companies having even more power over our health care choices and our pocket books)....no wonder the insurance companies love this witch so much.

2007-11-29 03:20:48 · answer #1 · answered by Calvin 7 · 1 0

She's not going to give the details of how it will work or how it will be paid for because the truth is that it is socialism and would require huge tax increases. The government is too involved as it is. Other than national defense we should let the free market handle most things to a greater extent. Ron Paul is also an idiot. If you want to vote for him you have absolutely no understanding of how the military keeps you safer in this world. I assure you that he is Usama's candidate of choice. Not even Hillary would stop fighting terrorists.

2007-11-29 03:17:03 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 2

Even if Hillary made it more affordable, she doesn't say what will happen to people who STILL cannot afford it-after all, it isn't going to be free. Some people cannot even afford a dollar a month for healthcare.
Do these people who cannot afford it go to jail, get fined, have higher taxes? She is not clear on the penalties for not having insurance.
To me, this signals she's on the side of doctors, and looking out for their interests alone.

2007-11-29 03:10:48 · answer #3 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 1 0

its not going to happen neo/con, Hillary is in the pockets of the health insurance lobby, where have you been?

2007-11-29 03:57:45 · answer #4 · answered by akadave 3 · 0 1

a vote for anyone but ron paul is a wasted vote, because everyone else works for the world bank.

2007-11-29 02:52:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Link me to her plan so I can verify your BS. If you can't, then that is all it is.

2007-11-29 02:59:10 · answer #6 · answered by grumpyoldman 7 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers