He always impresses me but, people always call him nutty. .
2007-11-29 02:30:13 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
If nothing else, Paul is an honest man who is willing to tell the difficult truth that most people don't want to hear, because he delivers bad news. What I like about Paul is that at least he would tackle these difficult issues facing America, instead of allowing them to continue to pile up until they are unfixable, like the last several Presidents and Congress have been doing.
In addition, nobody can label Ron Paul as a 'flip-flopper' like Romney, Giuliani, Huckabee, and McCain.
2007-11-29 02:37:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
this is annoying to "win" a debate, yet i think of a number of the so-referred to as 2d tier applicants, surprisingly those like Ron Paul and Tom Tancredo that have vast subjects to press, will earnings some notoriety this nighttime. i think of Romney is approximately to crash and burn, and everybody is observing to be certain if McCain can earnings some momentum this nighttime. he's below a lot of stress. So, there's a huge possibility for a number of the lesser time-honored applicants to push their way forward. so a techniques, maximum Republicans i comprehend are nonetheless waiting and observing. i actually think of this early initiate will harm the front-runners, with the aid of fact via the time the election comes, they are going to be burned out and persons would be bored with them. I guess that somebody will come forward abruptly. i might like to be certain Ron Paul stand out this nighttime. he's have been given a lot of super subjects to talk approximately. i'm hoping he gets the time.
2016-11-13 00:24:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ron Paul is a nut. Read the ENTIRE United States Constitution and check if his promises match with what the document states. In particular, read Article I, Section 8 and the 16th Amendment.
BTW. I read your last question (resolved) where you referred to people that did not agree with you as "chickenhawks". I have been deployed to Middle East twice; how about you? Know the people before you sling slurs at them.
2007-11-29 12:01:52 · answer #3 · answered by wichitaor1 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If you call someone being honest "nutty", and hey, maybe it is nutty in the sense that if you tell the truth that people don't want to hear it can cost you your popularity - but I would rather have a candidate willing to stand up there and tell the TRUTH regardless of how it is received by the people than have a candidate represent my country that lies and flipflops and wouldn't know the truth if it bit him in the ****.
2007-11-29 02:44:37 · answer #4 · answered by Kelsette 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
They call him nutty because they are afraid to think about what he says. People would rather just go with the flow and not have to take a reality check. Unfortunately in person RP is very good but in public he's just not charismatic enough. The people in his district absolutely love him. The only ones who don't are the aristocrats who have moved in of late and want to show people how its done. That and the uber soft that live in the northern section and are yellow dogs that would disparage anything other than a fellow yellow dog anyway.
2007-11-29 02:35:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
It depends on your criteria for determining a winner. If you choose a winner based on who has the most conviction that their plan is the best, and has been most consistent about their plan, then yes Ron Paul has won every debate hands down. If you place any value on the achievability of those plans then Ron Paul should just stay in Texas.
2007-11-29 02:36:40 · answer #6 · answered by Hubris252 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
"No not really. He has a clear decision on his solutions, but his solutions are DO IT NOW and dont worry about the consequences"
really i thought he was about not invading countries for no reason and assume there won't be consequences for it.
and by the way the ron paul has recieved the most donation for any canidate running for president from military officers and enlisted soldiers.
i also agree with the guy under me.i'm a democrat but its plain to see that ron paul is a true conservative he's what the conservative party use to be about but the republican party has lost its way so bad that he looks like a nut.but he's a true con not a neo con
2007-11-29 02:37:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
He does!!
Mike Gravel did so in the Democratic debates also.
It's far easier for members of their respective parties howl them down, and wiggle their way out of answering hard questions by calling Paul and Gravel "crazy" and "radical" than to admit that this country is truly ****** up and hone up to the fact that THEY are the problem!!!
2007-11-29 02:45:03 · answer #8 · answered by tiny Valkyrie 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Come on, this is going beyond comedy, Ron Paul has less chance of winning the presidency than i do and i would never be that dumb as to run for something i would not have a chance to win.
2007-11-29 02:35:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
John McCain easily won last nights debate.
Heres a tip for Ron Paul
On military issues never again should you tell John McCain the words you did last night" you do not understand"
Its why the crowd booed you when you were that ignorant.
2007-11-29 02:37:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋