Hillary Clinton - she will continue where she left off as 1st lady with the destruction of healthcare. Not to mention the traditional moral values of America.
2007-11-29 02:27:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by em T 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
Clinton. She is pushing socialism, has announced right here on Yahoo! Answers that she intends to do away with the Bill of Rights, she is a thief, a liar, a cheater and is in favor of some halfassed NAU and an important member of Builderburg.
2007-11-29 10:08:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
0⤋
Ron Paul gives me the creeps. Hillary is a criminal. Rudy is a talking head. Fred is too slow, John Edwards is a sleeze ball, Barak is a trainee...what I am saying is that I have no idea. They all seem kind of bad. Across the board.
2007-11-29 10:16:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by BL1957 3
·
5⤊
0⤋
Giuliani. He's corrupt and says he's against terrorism and last night I say on a news program that he had business dealings with Sheiks and an Emir. He visited them on more than one occasion in the Middle East. It turned out that one of them had harbored a higher up in Al Qaeda. That's coming out and the other candidates will jump on it. He pocketed an enormous amount of money from the Emir. I do not want a totally corrupt President in the White House.
2007-11-29 10:05:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Lettie D 7
·
2⤊
4⤋
I think that America is crossing a cultural and political threshold right now. There has never been such a great divide of ideas between the two political parties which has spurred the highest ever amount of people who identify themselves as Independent. I strongly believe that America must hold to its conservative ideals: a strong economy, a strong military defense, and strong families. Therefore, I would be most afraid of the most liberal presidential candidate: John Edwards.
2007-11-29 10:04:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ian 2
·
3⤊
5⤋
The Hildabeast. She's not taking positions on anything, other than federalized health care which is a BIG mistake. What her true agenda is remains unknown, but if she won't talk about it, it can't be good.
2007-11-29 10:06:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by SteveA8 6
·
7⤊
0⤋
the Clinton's i said the Clinton's it like the blue light special 2 for one on the flip flop
2007-11-29 10:17:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by butterfly 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Any of the democrat models trotted out so far; if one of them happens; high, higher and highest taxes; turmoil; and possibly the revolution that is fermenting under the surface right now.
2007-11-29 10:10:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by acmeraven 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
Hillary...I don't trust her as she is far too embedded with the lobbyists in Washington and is part of the problem, NOT the answer. She just comes across as a sleazebag and I never feel like she's being honest. That's just me though...
2007-11-29 10:03:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by jmb06010 2
·
9⤊
1⤋
Hitlery Clinton,God forbid. The US already had one war mongering pervert of her kind as president.
2007-11-29 10:09:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6
·
4⤊
1⤋