True, true.
Plus we will have 25 years of unbroken Bush/Clinton rule. There is something just un-American about that.
2007-11-29 01:19:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
First of all, I'm not a Hillary supporter. Having said that, it is ludicrous to say that Hillary will be the same as President Bush. The two stand for entirely different values. It is true that Bush has turned out to have leaned a little more left that was expected, but he's still a conservative. Hillary is a die-hard leftist.
The majority of Hillary supports want the good old days when President Clinton was in the oval office. I get confused sometimes as to who is running: Hillary or Bill? Bill is getting equal or more press attention regarding Hillary's campaign than Hillary is! There are numerous weaknesses in Hillary's campaign. Without giving boring details, her greatest asset is her last name. I think she knows that.
2007-11-29 09:18:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ian 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Youre a little confused.
It's the half brained people who put us in the situation we are in NOW, voting for Bush Lite.
No one who has half a brain supports Hillary, just the ones with complete, full and adequately functioning brains support Hillary.
But that's fine, keep up with the jokes and insults (those being the weapons of the intellectually lazy person), then be prepared to move to Iraq in protest over having to use the phrase "Madam President".
2007-11-29 09:46:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
As opposed to the last eight with that mental midget, President Bush. Hillary (whether you like her or not) is far different than Bush. They disagree on just about everything. You might not like her, but you can't say it is going to be the same.
The strongest candiate on either side is actually Bill Richardson from New Mexico but he doesn't have a chance. The one you should be concerned about is Rudy G. He is a Bush clone.
2007-11-29 09:24:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tina L 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
How can anyone with a complete brain not support her. She is very politically savvy, has goals that will result in programs that will actually provide rehabilitative training for inmates, so they will have some background that offers a marketable skill, she has been trying for years to legislate a health care system for our nations residents who do not have health coverage, and when a crisis occurs, they end up in the ER for treatment, which is 4 times more expensive than receiving care for prevention, not intervention, I believe she is not a buzzard, or raptor, like the warmongers now in office, and she has incredible negotiating skills. PLUS...She is very bright, articulate, determined, and has priorities that will benefit everyone in our nation, except of course, the republicans.
2007-11-29 09:21:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Would that mean that Bill Clinton is no good to.
I sure Hillary can do a better job than worn out Bush.
2007-11-29 09:16:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by t Preston 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
With only half a brain, a person would probably support anyone that came along if they were told what they wanted to hear. Half of the American population, or perhaps more, have nothing more than a "herd mentality" and are not prone to making rational decisions independently anyway.
2007-11-29 09:14:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by bjstree 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
not saying that i do support her but you have to look at were she stands on the issues and people feel strong on some thing they need someone that has the politics to back them in order to get things done and that is how the government works . its here to represent the people. and that might not be what you want so you voice your opinion and get out there and vote!!!
2007-11-29 09:15:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by spedhottie 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm sick of hearing about Senator Clinton's "Progressive" platform of taxation, rights for illegal aliens, etc., etc., etc.
I think of taxation this way. Let's say you have a job that pays $40,000. What you really end up taking home is closer to $30,000. So what you have is a $30,000.00 job. That being said, in order for the government to allow you to take that $30,000 home, you're enslaved an extra 33% of your work-time to pay the taxes on that $30,000.00. Given a 48 work-week year, it's as if your employer said "I'm giving you SIXTY days of vacation time to be with your family over and above the two weeks you currently get, but instead, you have to come in to work to pay the government."
SIXTY days I could be with my family, thrown away for HillaryCare, welfare for illegal aliens, etc., etc., etc. It sickens me.
2007-11-29 09:19:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by trentrockport 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
well while you have bush ,hillary , in the states you and your people will always be at war as money and war gotogether and those 2 are in power for money not the ameriacan people .only for gain peace not war .no to bush and no to hillary .
2007-11-29 09:16:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
How can anyone with out a brain and supported G.W.B 8 years
2007-11-29 09:44:59
·
answer #11
·
answered by awgaa 3
·
0⤊
1⤋