English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-11-28 18:34:21 · 13 answers · asked by Inou 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Heres a hint,,Isaiah53,,,Prov22....

2007-11-28 18:39:08 · update #1

13 answers

Hi there Flower. The Bible says that He was not much to look at. I can't rememebr the exact verse but maybe someone else will have it. I will keep looking for it too.

Great to see ya! God bless!

Seeing as how you like flowers:

(@))-->--------

LOL you knew all along. I like you!

Isa 53:2 For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, [there is] no beauty that we should desire him.

2007-11-28 18:40:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Jesus was a 'perfect' man. He would have been handsome and strong, with no faults at all, like poor eyesight or hearing.
Also he would have passed through childhood with no illnesses. And there were many in his day.

2007-11-29 03:17:54 · answer #2 · answered by pugjw9896 7 · 0 0

No comeliness that we should desire
Read
Isaiah 53 : 2

But he is all beautiful with the words that He speaks to me
Songs of Solomon 2 :10.......well these are the words We will all get to hear
Ain't He the finest?

2007-11-29 02:44:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

There is no data whatever on this subject, but it is a reasonable supposition that Jesus was good looking; people tend to pay more attention to good-looking persons.

2007-11-29 02:45:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Average looking Joe.

Man the Atheists who answered you here are pathetic today. Attacking for no reason at all. Where are the intelligent Atheists today?

2007-11-29 02:45:19 · answer #5 · answered by realchurchhistorian 4 · 1 1

It doesn't matter. He was in human form. So he looked like a man. What he came here for is most important, not what he looked like.

2007-11-29 02:41:20 · answer #6 · answered by Sweet Suzy 777! 7 · 2 0

He must have had a presence that was attractive to people, so maybe he was not physically great looking but his warmth and personality would have made him appealing to people.

2007-11-29 02:49:25 · answer #7 · answered by sparkleythings_4you 7 · 1 0

why does it matter if he was handsome or not
handsome or ugly
he still done so many things for us

2007-11-29 02:42:38 · answer #8 · answered by Celestina W 1 · 2 0

Who knows? and does it really matter? The guy was nothing more than a young rabbi who crossed the roman army. If even that . He was not the son of any god

2007-11-29 02:38:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

how can this question be answered when there are no pictures of him that were painted at the time, and of course no living witnesses as he died 2000 years ago!

2007-11-29 02:37:54 · answer #10 · answered by Diane 4 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers