Adam-God doctrine?

Question

Why do so many mormons accuse Brigham Young of teaching false doctrine? Anybody who's thoroughly researched this subject will see that he was absolutely serious for a very long time, even to his death. I would think that because he took us across america and turned the church of Jesus Christ away from the patriarchal order, we should be as reliant on his words as much as Joseph Smith's! Why don't I see anybody at all standing up in defence for the prophet immediately after Joseph Smith?

It was church doctrine. Where does your faith in the prophets begin if not with the early founders? How can people say that Brigham Young was crazy, mistaken, or anything else? Those that object with the teachings of Brigham Young shouldn't even consider themselves mormon. These are the people that should have stayed behind with Sidney Rigdon and Emma in the RLDS church. Tell me where Isaiah tells us that apostacy doesn't preceed the second coming.

Okay, sorry. That was a bit harsh. But aside from the Journal of Discourses, read Daniel Chapter 7 verses 9-13 and the chapter heading. Also D&C 88: 112. It talks about Michael's army (the host of heaven.) And guess who starts the ressurection? That's right-Michael! :)

Answer 1

thank you!!! lots of ppl say that stuff to me, im lds you see, and it makes me sick! i try to stand up for him, i do! but i'm kind of a wimp, and no one sticks around anyway... i'm glad im not alone in thinking this is wrong

Answer 2

Adam-God was a speculative theory, but it was never accepted as doctrine by the church. Today, pretty much no one in the mainstream Mormon church believes it.

Brigham Young was probably the one who gave birth to the theory. None of Brigham Young’s successors taught the concept (suggesting that the theory had not been confirmed valid by subsequent revelation from God), and many of his contemporaries did not accept the idea as doctrine. Even Brigham Young himself rarely spoke of his theory.

In 1902, the Church issued the following statement: “The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has never formulated or adopted any theory concerning the subject treated upon by President Young as to Adam.”

If you'd like to learn more about Mormons, visit my site at http://www.allaboutmormons.com .

Answer 3

Adam God theory is dismissed by the LDS church.
Adam would be later the Archangel Michael and in my opinion we should live like Father Adam then live like Jesus is because we are sinful and Jesus wasn't. To say Adam is God the Father is false doctrine and later Presidents of the Church said it is false doctrine. It isn't LDS doctrine and never has.

Answer 4

Yeah, Brigham replaced into actual incredibly pissed for some years that no-one agreed with him in this coaching approximately Adam God. a number of his close allies (like Orson Pratt) have been given on the bandwagon, besides the undeniable fact that it never went everywhere, and after he died, the coaching replaced into quietly forgotten. So replaced into it doctrine? Mormons say no. wager it calls into question despite if or no longer Brigham replaced right into a valid prophet of God. confident, Brigham and many others have taught the element approximately Mary and God. Apologists right this moment brush it off or maybe downright deny it. yet...this coaching is incredibly pervasive for over a hundred years by using many prophets and apostles. i visit would desire to declare...if it fairly is not doctrine then Mormon prophets have not to any extent further authority than each physique else interior the Mormon church. Brigham youthful suggested and did a number of of tousled stuff. yet on the different hand, so did Joseph in his final couple of years. variety of makes you ask your self, distinctly in case you have grown up understanding basically the expert "faith advertising" version of church historic previous like I did. you will usually in simple terms get annoyed analyzing the ridiculous motives placed forward by using the apologists. have confidence me, i've got long gone down each inch of that street... they do in simple terms no longer look to get that their motives do no longer make experience, or at as quickly as contradict what "prophets of God" have explicitly taught. Apologists seem waiting to compartmentalize issues fairly nicely. whilst the prophet speaks right this moment, they take it as gospel certainty. yet whilst somebody costs Joseph Smith or Brigham youthful, they brush aside it out of hand as "hypothesis and not doctrine". It defies reason and honesty.

Answer 5

I, also, think he was absolutely serious for a very long time, even to his death.

The LDS faith, at least in the time of Young, taught and believed that Adam was in fact God, come down to earth to mate and produce offspring with his own spirit daughter Eve.

Of course, this doesn't jive with other LDS doctrine that teaches that Adam's sin was actually a blessing in disguise. Either he sinned, making himself not God since God, according to the Bible, cannot sin. Or he was God and did not sin, but "fell" so that mankind might be able to become gods of their own.

The Adam-God Theory is just one of many fascinating LDS doctrines.

Answer 6

Because that would mean that other things the church has put into the "dont listen to it" category might be real and then it would throw a whole lot of members into uncertainty about everything.

Plus, it wasnt socially acceptable and still isnt.

Answer 7

The LDS church does not teach that Adam is God, so no, this is actually NOT just one of many fascinating lds doctrines.

Answer 8

I would not stand up for either of them as there is no evidence to back up either.

Answer 9

joseph smith was an idiot, so is the other one.